1,925
edits
Talk:Halo 4: Difference between revisions
→M6G Personal Defense Weapon System
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:^Agreed on the pistol/launcher Alex. The two are probably in the same series. Haha, anyone feel up for an M6-Doorbuster? I feel I should clarify my view on the thrusters: they would be ''specifically'' designed for zero-gravity, not as a "jump pack" like in Halo: Reach. They're easier to explain away in that case. --[[User talk:Bruce2401|Bruce2401]] 07:08, 7 June 2011 (EDT) | :^Agreed on the pistol/launcher Alex. The two are probably in the same series. Haha, anyone feel up for an M6-Doorbuster? I feel I should clarify my view on the thrusters: they would be ''specifically'' designed for zero-gravity, not as a "jump pack" like in Halo: Reach. They're easier to explain away in that case. --[[User talk:Bruce2401|Bruce2401]] 07:08, 7 June 2011 (EDT) | ||
It was my understanding that the pack on the back of the MJOLNIR Mark VI Powered Assault armor was the nuclear reactor that powered the assault armor (thus the name ''powered assault armor''). But could it be possible that the reactor could vent a small amount of its energy, therefor "thrusting" itself like a thruster pack? | |||
And about that pistol. Guys, do you know how much 500 years is? I'm sure that the UNSC have developed ammunition that is capable of making an explosion that of a modern day grenade (or bigger, considering that that explosion happened in space)[[User:Vegerot|<span style="color:midnightblue; font-weight:bold">Vegerot</span>]] ([[User talk:Vegerot|<span style="color:grey">talk</span>]]) 13:32, 7 June 2011 (EDT)! | |||