Halopedia talk:Featured/Article: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

Line 76: Line 76:


This article is extremley well written and raises the bar for proper citation of sources  which assured accurate information.--[[User talk:Sierra259|Sierra259]] 10:59, 30 March 2011 (EDT)
This article is extremley well written and raises the bar for proper citation of sources  which assured accurate information.--[[User talk:Sierra259|Sierra259]] 10:59, 30 March 2011 (EDT)
== Support ==


== Neutral ==
== Neutral ==

Revision as of 10:02, March 30, 2011

Preston Jeremiah Cole

An excellent article, excellently written with solid sourcing and notes per the new sourcing guidelines. Evolutions has provided a lot of new information for him and I think the article warrants some time as a featured article. - S.B.44 [Talk] 01:12, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Support (Won)

  1. Support.svg Support - per nomination - S.B.44 [Talk] 01:12, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Support.svg Support - I was just thinking this the other day. It's very well written, very detailed and well sourced. It's featured article material in my book. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 01:16, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Support.svg Support - Hell yeah! The article is very well witten, and we have not had a new fetured article in almost 2 years I think. --"We are not backing down now. Besides, I dont like losing, remember?" User: Yugiohtipman34 01:19, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Support.svg Support - And it's done. User:CommanderTony/Sig
sweet. - S.B.44 [Talk] 01:40, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Halopedia Vote Symbol Neutral.svg Neutral Being a picky bastard right now; sources should be well cited; that includes page numbers and what chapters they were mentioned/appeared in and formatted properly. Some of the content looks legit but potentially well made-up. Citations would clear things up. And yes, I'm just voicing my opinion on how to further improve the article and am not going to do it right now.(7alk) 01:38, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

Catherine Elizabeth Halsey (Won)

Dr. Halsey is an integral part of the Halo canon. From her development of the MJOLNIR armor system, to the augmentations performed on the Spartan-II's , and even the creation of Cortana, Halsey has indirectly saved humanity many times. She has not been directly mentioned in any of the games but it is clear that she is one of the most important characters in halo universe and warrants featured article status. In addition to this it is a well written article, and fits all of CommanderTony's new criteria for featured articles. - S.B.44 [T] 03:47, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support.svg Support - Per nomination, - S.B.44 [T] 03:47, March 17, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Support.svg Support It's a well written, and sourced, article. There's a few places, currently, where inline citations are scarce (working on that), but those are far and few between. If FA's are to be a regular event this would be a good one to move on to. -- Lord Hyren 04:29, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Support.svg Support - What ShadowBroker said. :P --"Why am I here and what the hell are you?"The guy who hates his username. 05:31, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Support.svg Support - And it's done. User:CommanderTony/Sig

Neutral

Oppose

New Mombasa (Won)

New Mombasa has had a flood of new information upon the release of ODST, and it has been maintained to a high standard since then. It is well written, laid out accordingly, fully sourced, has a fine amount of images in the main article, and a sizable gallery. Being such an integral part of the series, being a main setting in Halo 2 and Halo 3: ODST, its article does it justice. It fits all of CT's new Featured Article criteria. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 20:17, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support.svg Support - As per above suggestion. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 20:17, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Support.svg Support - It's definitely a good choice. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 20:57, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Support.svg Support -- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 19:36, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Support.svg Support - - File:Major.png Nìcmávr (Tálk) 19:10, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Support.svg Support -- Lord Hyren 19:24, May 2, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Support.svg Support - File:Commander Silver Leaf.PNG Kougermasters (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 19:54, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

Oppose

Thel 'Vadam

In addition to being a well written-well sourced article, the Arbiter is the second most important character in the Halo series. He heavily influences the entire Halo Universe and stands out as an example of what a Sangheili should be. - User:ShadowBroker44/sig 00:34, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support

Support.svg Support - per nomination - User:ShadowBroker44/sig 00:34, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

Halopedia Vote Symbol Neutral.svg Neutral The article is well cited until material from Halo 2 is being covered, and the citations all but disappear in the sections following. It wouldn't take much work to add them, and if added I'll change my vote, but for now I must remain neutral. I won't say the article shouldn't be featured, but it just isn't there yet for me. -- Lord Hyren 04:43, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

SPARTAN-B312 (Won)

For an article about a character that technically has no gender, SPARTAN-B312 is both surprisingly well written and well constructed. Noble Six would be an excellent featured article in light of the recent release of Halo: Reach. The article is sourced well, and exceeds the minimum size of a featured article. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) 16:41, 5 November 2010 (EDT)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

Slipstream space (Won)

An excellent article, written with solid sourcing and notes.- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 19:08, 2 January 2011 (EST)

Support

Neutral

Oppose

Carter-A259

This article is extremley well written and raises the bar for proper citation of sources which assured accurate information.--Sierra259 10:59, 30 March 2011 (EDT)

Neutral

Opposed