Talk:Lone Wolf Spartan statue glitch: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:11, February 8, 2011

Are we sure this is John-117? There is no actual verification as to who it is exactly. It is just a Mark VI model to me, not John in particular.--File:PENGUIN4.gifFluffyEmoPenguin^{(ice quack!)} 15:34, 28 December 2010 (EST)

I question this being an easter egg at all. I believe it's more of a forgotten reference model than an egg for us to find. But you are at the very least, correct. Just like with the Cryo Chamber, we cannot actually determine if this is a "statue" of the Master Chief. XRoadToDawnX 13:05, 1 January 2011 (EST)

Glitch or easter egg?

I suggest that this page be renamed to "Lone Wolf Spartan glitch" or something of the like. This "statue" looks more like a leftover from production than a reference, it is untextured, extra small and it doesn't really mean much. Compare it to other easter eggs. The flyable pelican/phantom? Clearly left by Bungie as a treat to their fans. The Tribute Room? Obviously put in by Bungie. From wikipedia, "A virtual Easter egg is an intentional hidden message, in-joke or feature in an object such as a movie, book, CD, DVD, computer program, web page or video game." If you think about it, every other easter egg we know of is obviously intentional, but we have no reason to believe that this was intentional. And how is this a hidden message or joke? DatrDeletr 06:25, 26 January 2011 (EST)

Helloooo? Anyone care to comment? I would prefer a response. I will move this page unless someone has a better suggestion.DatrDeletr 09:10, 31 January 2011 (EST)

Easter Egg because it was intentionally placed there, glitch if it wasn't. And please don't force pseudo-threats like that again. Tuckerscreator^(stalk) 10:05, 31 January 2011 (EST)

The latter most likely; a sound distinction between an easter egg and a glitch as provided by DatrDeletr. — subtank 10:45, 31 January 2011 (EST)

I'm inclined to agree with DatrDeletr and Subtank, it strikes me more as a forgotten reference than any sort of meaningful easter egg. XRoadToDawnX 21:41, 4 February 2011 (EST)

It definitely is an easter egg. There is no other reason for there to be a Mark VI model in the map. If it was a base model, such as Mark V [B], it might had been left by accident. However, Mark VI is not a base model or render. It is an easter, albeit small. - Anonymous 15:11, 8 February 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 21:41, February 4, 2011 (edit) XRoadToDawnX (talk \| contribs) (→‎Glitch or easter egg?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:11, February 8, 2011 (edit) (undo) 67.60.26.176 (talk) (→‎Glitch or easter egg?) Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	::I'm inclined to agree with DatrDeletr and Subtank, it strikes me more as a forgotten reference than any sort of meaningful easter egg. [[User talk:XRoadToDawnX\|XRoadToDawnX]] 21:41, 4 February 2011 (EST)		::I'm inclined to agree with DatrDeletr and Subtank, it strikes me more as a forgotten reference than any sort of meaningful easter egg. [[User talk:XRoadToDawnX\|XRoadToDawnX]] 21:41, 4 February 2011 (EST)

			:::It definitely is an easter egg. There is no other reason for there to be a Mark VI model in the map. If it was a base model, such as Mark V [B], it might had been left by accident. However, Mark VI is not a base model or render. It is an easter, albeit small. - Anonymous 15:11, 8 February 2011 (EST)