Talk:Sh'wada-pattern supercarrier: Difference between revisions

Talk:Sh'wada-pattern supercarrier (edit)

Revision as of 12:35, November 4, 2010

252 bytes added , 14 years ago

→‎Classification

Anonymous user

152.71.185.174

Revision as of 12:02, November 4, 2010 (edit) Tacitus (talk \| contribs) (→‎Classification: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 12:35, November 4, 2010 (edit) (undo) 152.71.185.174 (talk) (→‎Classification) Newer edit →
Line 291:		Line 291:

	All of this is, of course, problematic for us. We're not sure if the supercarrier in ''Reach'' is called that by the Covenant, but because we have no other name, we should obviously keep it on this page. Even so, I think it should be mentioned on the page that "supercarrier" has been used to refer to three ships of different size. --[[User:Jugus\|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus\|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jugus\|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 13:02, 4 November 2010 (EDT)		All of this is, of course, problematic for us. We're not sure if the supercarrier in ''Reach'' is called that by the Covenant, but because we have no other name, we should obviously keep it on this page. Even so, I think it should be mentioned on the page that "supercarrier" has been used to refer to three ships of different size. --[[User:Jugus\|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus\|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Jugus\|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 13:02, 4 November 2010 (EDT)

			:It would most certainly be better. I would suggest not only adding the info in the article, but also in the infobox... for those who loves skimming through articles.[[Special:Contributions/152.71.185.174\|152.71.185.174]] 13:35, 4 November 2010 (EDT)