User talk:Dark Neptune: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

Line 151: Line 151:
The Fuel Rod Cannon is an entirely different weapon, described only in the books. The only times this weapon has been mentioned is in Halo:the Flood where a Banshee used it as a heavy weapon to destroy a trailer of ammunition and in First Strike where a pair of Hunters used them. This indicates that the Halo 2-3 era version of the Hunter's weapon and the Fuel Rod Cannon seen throughout the series are the only weapons that can be called "Fuel Rod Cannons" if Halopedia is to retain its claim of following canon. Bungie made a mistake? Fuel Rod Gun is a misnomer? Sure. The thing is, this wiki follows what canon is, not what it should be. Canon > realism--[[User:TerminalFailure|TerminalFailure]] 05:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
The Fuel Rod Cannon is an entirely different weapon, described only in the books. The only times this weapon has been mentioned is in Halo:the Flood where a Banshee used it as a heavy weapon to destroy a trailer of ammunition and in First Strike where a pair of Hunters used them. This indicates that the Halo 2-3 era version of the Hunter's weapon and the Fuel Rod Cannon seen throughout the series are the only weapons that can be called "Fuel Rod Cannons" if Halopedia is to retain its claim of following canon. Bungie made a mistake? Fuel Rod Gun is a misnomer? Sure. The thing is, this wiki follows what canon is, not what it should be. Canon > realism--[[User:TerminalFailure|TerminalFailure]] 05:07, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


"“It’s so weird. I don’t know who first called it a '''fuel rod gun''', but it’s kind’a funny. I suppose the projectile is reminiscent of how you might expect to see a nuclear fuel rod depicted in a gee eh cartoon—all glowing green and throwing off sparks.”"
"“It’s so weird. I don’t know who first called it a ''fuel rod gun'', but it’s kind’a funny. I suppose the projectile is reminiscent of how you might expect to see a nuclear fuel rod depicted in a gee eh cartoon—all glowing green and throwing off sparks.”"


Happy now? Between the books, the games, and Bungie's own releases, there's enough evidence to prove me right. Any further edits in the spirit of your last one will be treated as vandalism and reverted. --[[User:TerminalFailure|TerminalFailure]] 17:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Happy now? Between the books, the games, and Bungie's own releases, there's enough evidence to prove me right. Any further edits in the spirit of your last one will be treated as vandalism and reverted. --[[User:TerminalFailure|TerminalFailure]] 17:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:47, April 24, 2008

DN's User Talk Page