12,820
edits
Talk:Plasma: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Dragonclaws (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Dragonclaws (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Moreover, he claims that the weakness of plasma weapons in the games conflicts with the strength of plasma in the books. But we do see plasma weapons killing people in the books. We do see marines get killed by the Elite's plasma rifles. Plasma rifles can cut through armor, just like we see in the book. | Moreover, he claims that the weakness of plasma weapons in the games conflicts with the strength of plasma in the books. But we do see plasma weapons killing people in the books. We do see marines get killed by the Elite's plasma rifles. Plasma rifles can cut through armor, just like we see in the book. | ||
So, really, there is no reason to conclude a break in canon here. The information in the books agrees with the video games. | So, really, there is no reason to conclude a break in canon here. The information in the books agrees with the video games. {{unsigned|69.143.98.60}} | ||
The author has a point though. Often it seems in the book that being touched by any plasma means your screwed. Marines and machines are destroyed nigh instantaneously by plasma in the books but soak the same amount like sponges in the game.{{unsigned|71.171.111.82}} | |||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
Maybe I shouldn't be questioning this, but shouldn't a little background on Plasma as a substance be added i.e.: "Plasma is a fourth state of matter in the universe?" | Maybe I shouldn't be questioning this, but shouldn't a little background on Plasma as a substance be added i.e.: "Plasma is a fourth state of matter in the universe?" | ||
Anyone agree, disagree?{{unsigned|70.237.131.197}} | Anyone agree, disagree?{{unsigned|70.237.131.197}} | ||