Talk:Temple (Installation 05): Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
Why don't we have articles on the towers in the level, Halo? Those look more important than this. [[User:AlphaPrime|AlphaPrime]] 00:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Why don't we have articles on the towers in the level, Halo? Those look more important than this. [[User:AlphaPrime|AlphaPrime]] 00:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
:Those things that shoot beams in the air? I believe we do. I'm not sure of the name it's under, though. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="000000">Dragon<font color="FF0000">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="000000">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 00:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
:Those things that shoot beams in the air? I believe we do. I'm not sure of the name it's under, though. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="000000">Dragon<font color="FF0000">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="000000">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 00:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
'''MERGE''' into the current article, when we find it. Once the grammar, spelling and punctuation are cleaned up, there may be some useful info in here. I also reject the idea that we can't have an article on every Halo structure. If there is enough content, why not? It's not like we've got a limit here. Granted, we can't have an article on every rock or boulder, but several buildings may have arc significance later on in the story - we don't know yet. -- [[User:Manticore|<b><span style="color: black">Manticore</span></b>]] [[Image:Fleet Admiral.jpg|25px]] [[User talk:Manticore|<sup><span style="color: black">Talk</span></sup>]]<sup> | </sup>[[Special:Contributions/Manticore|<sup><span style="color: black">CSV</span></sup>]] 14:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:32, April 8, 2007

Votes

  • DELETE This isn't needed. If we keep this we might as well make articles for every single building on the Halos. -- AlphaPrime 02:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  • KEEP But it's an important structure; one seventh (CONSPIRACY!) of the playable levels of Halo 2 are based around this building. Güéߣ¥-éҐøñ¥-ħîИg¥ 02:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  • KEEP Yea, it is an important structure. Capt Bartlett 15:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  • We have articles on the two levels it's featured in. Besides, it's not even that important, nothing happens in it besides Regret getting killed and it blowing up.

Why don't we have articles on the towers in the level, Halo? Those look more important than this. AlphaPrime 00:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Those things that shoot beams in the air? I believe we do. I'm not sure of the name it's under, though. --Dragonclaws(talk) 00:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

MERGE into the current article, when we find it. Once the grammar, spelling and punctuation are cleaned up, there may be some useful info in here. I also reject the idea that we can't have an article on every Halo structure. If there is enough content, why not? It's not like we've got a limit here. Granted, we can't have an article on every rock or boulder, but several buildings may have arc significance later on in the story - we don't know yet. -- Manticore Fleet Admiral.jpg Talk | CSV 14:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)