Talk:Hydrostatic gel: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:37, April 12, 2007

Hydrostatic gel

I read this article and i was wondering, If it makes DIRECT contact with skin,then that means the spartans are naked in the armor?--Mac10&Cheese 03:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Probably. The armor would be bulkier with clothing. --Dragonclaws^(talk) 05:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Of course! Wouldn't you like to kill a bunch of Covenant and Flood and stuff and then just suddenly yell in an obnoxiously high-pitched voice... "because I'm NAKED!!!!!"? I know I would... too bad my uncle's always here... and he spends most of his time in the room with my XBox... O_o G^üé_ßŁ^¥-∏_éҐ^∫ø_ñ¥-^†ħ_îИ^g¥ 07:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

What? Doesn't the armor count as clothing? It's like saying, "Underneath those clothes... nude." --Dragonclaws^(talk) 07:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

I was just saying becouse it makes direct contact so you must be nude in the armor,i mean it dosent say direct contact with clothes.

Revision as of 02:27, April 9, 2007 (edit) Dragonclaws (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:37, April 12, 2007 (edit) (undo) halowikia>Mac10&Cheese (→‎Hydrostatic gel) Newer edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::What? Doesn't the armor count as clothing? It's like saying, "Underneath those clothes... nude." --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws\|<font color="000000">Dragon<font color="FF0000">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws\|<font color="000000">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 07:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)		::What? Doesn't the armor count as clothing? It's like saying, "Underneath those clothes... nude." --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws\|<font color="000000">Dragon<font color="FF0000">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws\|<font color="000000">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 07:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
			I was just saying becouse it makes direct contact so you must be nude in the armor,i mean it dosent say direct contact with clothes.