Talk:Installation 04: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
TheLostJedi (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
[[100,000 B.C.E.]] is stated to be the year the Halos were fired, yet on this article's page it states the year Installation 04 was created in was 98,665 BC, which is after the rings fired. So I'm confused. Can anyone help me on this? -[[User:TheLostJedi|'''<span style="color:maroon">TheLostJedi</span>''']] 14:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | [[100,000 B.C.E.]] is stated to be the year the Halos were fired, yet on this article's page it states the year Installation 04 was created in was 98,665 BC, which is after the rings fired. So I'm confused. Can anyone help me on this? -[[User:TheLostJedi|'''<span style="color:maroon">TheLostJedi</span>''']] 14:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I suppose 100,000 B.C. is too general for the page's information, the year 98,665 must be a more accurate year for when the Installations fired. [[Image:Halopedia - Anti-Vandal Assault Corps Logo 01.PNG|25px]][[Halopedia:UNSC of Halopedia|<font color="silver"><b>General]]</b></font> [[User:CommanderTony|<b><font color="crimson">Tony</font>]]</b><sup>[[User Talk:CommanderTony|<b><font color="black">Talk]]</font></b></sup> 11/20/2007 | |||
Revision as of 09:35, November 20, 2007
Should it be merged?
I'm kinda neutral on this. On one hand it is about the size of the Halos, which would fit with the other article. However if you look at the ending movie of Halo 2, it shows all seven Halos and each is a different size. I'm assuming Installation 01 being the smallest and Installation 07 the biggest. AlphaPrime 20:56, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP as is. The astronomy section only pretains to this Halo, not the others, they don't orbit the same planet. -ED 20:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP The articles have enough differences to be left alone. -Broinarm117 11:26, 6 April 2007
- KEEP They have many reasons to remain seperate.--Gerzam File:Gerzam.jpg [Communications] [Past Battles] 22:19, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- MERGE Just change it so it doesn't specifically say it orbits Threshold; just say they all orbit some planet or another on a lagrange point. Güéߣ¥-∏éҐ∫øñ¥-†ħîИg¥ 04:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Other Theories
I don't know if anyone has considered this, but is it possible that some of the flood on the ring survived its "destruction" and perhaps still inhabit the remaining chunks? Just a theory that has been nagging me for a while.
- That is very possible. --ED(talk)(shockfront) 19:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- How frightening.
I could put this in discussion of Installation 04 or 05, but who cares. They never show what the OTHER side of halo actual contains, I'm guessing it's just forerunner material but who knows? User: Starwarsguy9875
Only the inside is hospitable for Earth life, I think. But for the Flood, I'm unsure what environments they can survive. I'd assume it's just Forerunner technology on the outer ring though, but who knows. -TheLostJedi 14:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Date of Firing
100,000 B.C.E. is stated to be the year the Halos were fired, yet on this article's page it states the year Installation 04 was created in was 98,665 BC, which is after the rings fired. So I'm confused. Can anyone help me on this? -TheLostJedi 14:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- I suppose 100,000 B.C. is too general for the page's information, the year 98,665 must be a more accurate year for when the Installations fired. File:Halopedia - Anti-Vandal Assault Corps Logo 01.PNGGeneral TonyTalk 11/20/2007
