User talk:Manticore: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(colour of my signature) |
(signature code) |
||
Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
I tweaked these to simplify the code of my sig.I am a little bit worried that these may change the look of my signature or affect its functionality. Does it? | I tweaked these to simplify the code of my sig.I am a little bit worried that these may change the look of my signature or affect its functionality. Does it? | ||
--[[user:Spartan781|<b><font color="LightGrey">Sp</font><font color="DarkGray">art</font><font color="Gray">an7</font><font color="Black">81</font></b>]] [[Image:Kill_Frenzy_Medal.gif|30px]] [[User talk:Spartan781|<sup><span style="color: black">Comm</span></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Spartan781|<sub><span style="color: black">CSV</span></sub>]] 08:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC) | --[[user:Spartan781|<b><font color="LightGrey">Sp</font><font color="DarkGray">art</font><font color="Gray">an7</font><font color="Black">81</font></b>]] [[Image:Kill_Frenzy_Medal.gif|30px]] [[User talk:Spartan781|<sup><span style="color: black">Comm</span></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Spartan781|<sub><span style="color: black">CSV</span></sub>]] 08:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
== signature code == | |||
hey, what's the difference between <nowiki><span style="color: black"></nowiki> and <nowiki><font color="black"></nowiki>? I saw other users' signatures and saw that they use the latter in their signatures. What difference does it make? | |||
--[[user:Spartan781|<b><font color="LightGrey">Sp</font><font color="DarkGray">art</font><font color="Gray">an7</font><font color="Black">81</font></b>]] [[Image:Kill_Frenzy_Medal.gif|30px]] [[User talk:Spartan781|<sup><span style="color: black">Comm</span></sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Spartan781|<sub><span style="color: black">CSV</span></sub>]] 06:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:23, July 19, 2007
Talk Archive | ||
Archive 1: 14 January - 16 February, 2007 | ||
Archive 2: 23 February - 12 April, 2007 | ||
Archive 3: 12 April - 17 May, 2007 | ||
Archive 4: 21 May - 5 June, 2007 | ||
Archive 5: 7 June - 1 July, 2007 | ||
Archive 6: 1 July - 4 July, 2007 | ||
Archive 7: 4 July - 15 July, 2007 | ||
NoI dont think they will, and i didnt do any harm with my rollback, i just re-added a link you took out. Just take out wat you feel is wrong in the articals, they are used in halo so they should get a artical on them on the web site about halo stuff!--UNSCOH COL. "Running Riot" Ryan BAM 22:30, 2 July 2007 (UTC) 02:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
M19 SSM PollHey! I NEED your vote on User:Spartan781/Project. Go there and vote. Thanks! --Spartan781 CommCSV 06:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC) M19 SSM PollHey wait, who got the idea that M19 and M41 are both different launchers anyway? Bungie didn't say anything about those two right? Not even telling whether they are the same or not. Stupid Bungie.... :-) --Spartan781 CommCSV 09:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
M19/M41 Debate (Yep it's back again!)Dear Manticore, Initially I had doubts about this, but I've done some research using only Bungie related sources and have found myself agreeing with Spartan781. I have collated this research on the User:Spartan781/Project. I wondered if you could take a look at it and see if it changes your opinion on the matter. Thankyou for your time, A Monument to All Your Sins 22:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC) IP inviteIts Spartan 1138. My aunts ISP won't keep me logged in.-- Spartan 1138 M19 SSM Poll resultsEr...can you help me get some official info about the M41 launcher? I need proof for my project voting page. They all demand one from me. I spent a total of probably more than 9 hours(over several days) to find one. PLEASE HELP ME!!!! I'm desperate! If you manage to find one, you'll get a very nice award from me(I'll create a special one for you). Thank you very much! --Spartan781 CommCSV 10:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
--Spartan781 CommCSV 10:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC) Rocket Launcher DebateDear Manticore, wasn't sure if you'd had a chance to see this yet so I've sent it to you, it's Bungie sources for Spartan 781's argument. Ok, here we go. The Rocket Launcher wielded in Halo Combat Evolved according to the game manual was the "M19 SSM Rocket Launcher"[1] so this name is Bungie approved. However the in game weapon model clearly shows the marking "M41 MAV/AW" printed above the "correct usage" diagram[2]. This is the source of the naming problem. In Halo 2 the Rocket Launcher was altered, this we agree on, the main alteration being the new lock on ability. In the both versions of the Halo 2 manual this weapon is once again designated the "M19 SSM Rocket Launcher"[3] and likewise the weapon model again bears the "M41 MAV/AW" marking[4]. On Halo3.com the Rocket Launcher is reffered to only as the "M41 Rocket Launcher" and from the public Beta it appears to be the same variation as that in Combat Evolved. This version has no acronyms after it which has caused many to view it as a new Rocket Launcher type. All of these sources are directly from Bungie. So the "M41 MAV/AW" section of the name could be the model number of the Rocket Launcher, an overall designation for that class of weapon. Since both homing and non-homing versions of the rocket launcher, from Halo 2 and Halo: Combat Evolved respectively, are called the "M19 SSM Rocket Launcher" perhaps it should all be one section. But what of the acronyms, what do they mean? Do they help in this debate? Using the website [1] and their military acronym list. The SSM part of "M19 SSM Rocket Launcher" probably refers to it's nature as a Surface-to-Surface-Missile launcher. As for "M41 MAV/AW" could represent Minimum Acceptable Value/Automatic Weapon which would coincide with the launchers nature as a slow firing, automatic weapon (the automated rotation of the missile tubes into firing position). Since the M41 section is printed on the launcher for the rocket tubes, is it not possible that this is the designation for the launcher? But once the tubes and launcher are combined into an actual offensive weapon it is known as the "M19 SSM Rocket Launcher". Just food for thought. I am of the conclusion that the M41 and the M19 are infact two designations for the same weapon. As such only one page should exist, or atleast a disambiguation page named "M41 MAV/AW" with a subheading dealing with the "M19 SSM Rocket Launcher" and the homing/non homing variations. We should take the game manuals to be gospel in this case. Both the Halo and Halo 2 Rocket Launchers are listed as the "M19 SSM Rocket Launcher" in these manuals. Other than in a third-party guidebook (and therefore non-direct Bungie source) this has been the case throughout. At least we should stop referring to the M41 as the Halo 2 Rocket launcher. Since we do not have a copy of Halo 3, by all means leave the Halo 3 Rocket Launcher name as undecided, perhaps it should be placed in its own category as a subheading in the "M19 SSM" Section. I apologise for the length of this, :-) Please respond, thanks. Sources--A Monument to All Your Sins 14:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC) M19 SSM EvidenceHey Manticore, be sure to check out User:spartan781/Project again. I posted two Bungie forum links. Check those pages to see if it convinces you. If not, please tell me why, then I know what evidence to give you. Thanks! --Spartan781 CommCSV 07:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC) colour of my signatureDoes it change the look of my signature if I change the colour part of my signature as in like this:
I tweaked these to simplify the code of my sig.I am a little bit worried that these may change the look of my signature or affect its functionality. Does it? --Spartan781 CommCSV 08:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC) signature codehey, what's the difference between <span style="color: black"> and <font color="black">? I saw other users' signatures and saw that they use the latter in their signatures. What difference does it make? --Spartan781 CommCSV 06:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC) |
|}