Talk:Unyielding Hierophant

Does anyone have pic of the Unyielding Hierophant--Darth nexes 19:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I bet not...for now atleast.--prophit of war 22:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

It was simmiler, if not a double of High Charity Try doubling that image, just like the frigate pages.

No image exists, and if one is made, I gurentee you it won't pass in the FanArt comittee. -ED 19:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Where is it stated that the Unyielding Hierophant is in the Tau Ceti system? I checked First Strike, but I couldn't find anywhere that it stated the system it was in.--Raptor117 03:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, the guys at HBO set me straight. The epilogue of First Strike indicates that the Unyielding Hierophant was in Tau Ceti.--Raptor117 03:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Uneven Elephant

That. Is. The. Funniest. Damn. Thing. I. Have. Ever. Heard.

Fleet size?

There seems to be a discrepancy in the fleet size, the initial part of the article refers to it being a rendez-vous for 300 ships but the later section details 500 ships being destroyed. I'm trying to remember the section on when the details of this rendez-vous were discovered, is this where the 300 figure comes from? --Johnmcl7 05:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

high charity

i'm not shure but could high carity be an un-exploded side of unyielding hierophant? that whould explain high charity's ability to travle and it's wird shape (the botom that semes broken), after the spartans imploded the one lobe of it they called the probe back never cheking the destruction, the other half could have bhen re-bilt, the interior descriptions are similar to the levels in high harity.--scuba7292 12:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

I doubt it; the Unyielding Hierophant was a battle station, High Charity is their homeworld and a Holy City. G^üé_ߣ^¥-∏_éҐ^∫ø_ñ¥-^†ħ_îИ^g¥ 23:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Elephants?

I just checked this page and all it says in the first two sections is "elephants" "elephants" "elephants", like its some kind of bad joke. So, if any one could correct this, it would be greatly apriciated. -Anonomus

• I think someone has fixed this.--Lt. Commander^COMM 01:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)