Talk:Zanar-pattern light cruiser: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:


*'''Strong Keep''' Actually, the text reads "Two exceptions to this patrol pattern were a pair of light cruisers hovering over Menachite Mountain". The text can be found on page 167 (beginning of chapter 18) in [[Halo: First Strike]]. Prior to this, it mentions heavy cruisers ("There were a total of thirteen heavy cruisers and three carriers moving three hundred kilometers above the surface of the planet." also page 167 [[Halo: First Strike]]) thus differentiating the light cruiser from the CAR-class heavy cruiser. -- [[User:Rotaretilbo|Rotaretilbo]] 16:24, 05 December 2006
*'''Strong Keep''' Actually, the text reads "Two exceptions to this patrol pattern were a pair of light cruisers hovering over Menachite Mountain". The text can be found on page 167 (beginning of chapter 18) in [[Halo: First Strike]]. Prior to this, it mentions heavy cruisers ("There were a total of thirteen heavy cruisers and three carriers moving three hundred kilometers above the surface of the planet." also page 167 [[Halo: First Strike]]) thus differentiating the light cruiser from the CAR-class heavy cruiser. -- [[User:Rotaretilbo|Rotaretilbo]] 16:24, 05 December 2006
**So anyway...I don't hear anyone arguing, and the text I posted is rather clear, so I'm going to remove the fact or fiction from the article. I'll leave the discussion intact, and if you think I made the wrong decision, just put it back.--[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rotaretilbo]] 16:29, 06 December 2006

Revision as of 18:29, December 6, 2006

Template:FactOrFictionTalk Is there a pic of them?--Ryanngreenday 10:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Or a page number if it's only in the book? --Dragonclaws 17:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

They are un the book and the are disscribed in first strike.--Ryanngreenday 13:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

  • What page is it mentioned? -- Esemono 12:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

This is a Covenant CAR-class heavy cruiser!

  • Merge - This is just a differnt version of the Covenant CAR-class heavy cruiser, it should be merged with the covenant cruser. --Darth nexes 19:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)darth Nexes
  • Delete - If this is fan fiction then there is no point keeping it. -- Esemono 23:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep - It is mentioned in First Strike. However, there's no evidence that it is a CAR-class.RelentlessRecusantFile:Jedi Order.jpg 03:40, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • What page is it mentioned? -- Esemono 12:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Anyway, I can not cite the exact apge that liststhe existence of the C.L.C., but I remember seeing, "...there were also two light cruisers at the bottom of the gravity well, so they were not a threat to her." This is when John and the others storm Reach to find his missing Spartans. Cheers, RelentlessRecusantFile:Jedi Order.jpg 13:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • If we can get confirmation of this, then we can remove the Dispute and move on to the other ship "classifications" -- Esemono 14:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • DELETE the actual text from HFS, "...there were also two Battlecruisers at the bottom of the gravity well, so they were not a threat to her." -- Fist of Rukt 04:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Well well well...perhaps either your copy is radically different from mine or that our eyes are different. Someone do us a favor and check. Cheers, RelentlessRecusantFile:Jedi Order.jpg 21:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep Actually, the text reads "Two exceptions to this patrol pattern were a pair of light cruisers hovering over Menachite Mountain". The text can be found on page 167 (beginning of chapter 18) in Halo: First Strike. Prior to this, it mentions heavy cruisers ("There were a total of thirteen heavy cruisers and three carriers moving three hundred kilometers above the surface of the planet." also page 167 Halo: First Strike) thus differentiating the light cruiser from the CAR-class heavy cruiser. -- Rotaretilbo 16:24, 05 December 2006
    • So anyway...I don't hear anyone arguing, and the text I posted is rather clear, so I'm going to remove the fact or fiction from the article. I'll leave the discussion intact, and if you think I made the wrong decision, just put it back.--Rotaretilbo 16:29, 06 December 2006