Talk:Kewu-pattern battleship: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Rotaretilbo (talk | contribs) |
Rotaretilbo (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*'''Delete''' this fan fiction name is mere conjecture, or speculation. Speculation is something that is banned on Halopedia. -- [[User:Yamanba|Yamanba]] 06:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' this fan fiction name is mere conjecture, or speculation. Speculation is something that is banned on Halopedia. -- [[User:Yamanba|Yamanba]] 06:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Strong Keep''' - the information on this ship is real, it is simply the name that is under dispute. It was a major plot device in the [[Battle of Reach]], and was a large reason for the Covenant's sack of the UNSC. Like Wookieepedia does, I recommend to keep it the way it is: with the hypothesized name, but a tag listing its ambiguity, unless you have something better? Cheers, '''[[User:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="red">Relentless</font>]][[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="blue">Recusant</font>]][[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]]''' 16:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC) | *'''Strong Keep''' - the information on this ship is real, it is simply the name that is under dispute. It was a major plot device in the [[Battle of Reach]], and was a large reason for the Covenant's sack of the UNSC. Like Wookieepedia does, I recommend to keep it the way it is: with the hypothesized name, but a tag listing its ambiguity, unless you have something better? Cheers, '''[[User:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="red">Relentless</font>]][[User talk:RelentlessRecusant|<font color="blue">Recusant</font>]][[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]]''' 16:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
'''Keep''' - Unless you can prove the ship found in [[Halo: The Fall of Reach]] (page number coming to stores near you) during the [[Battle of Reach]] is without a doubt an [[Assault Carrier]], then it would be "rampant speculation" to say this is an Assault Carrier, would it not?--[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]] 2334 6.12.06 | *'''Keep''' - Unless you can prove the ship found in [[Halo: The Fall of Reach]] (page number coming to stores near you) during the [[Battle of Reach]] is without a doubt an [[Assault Carrier]], then it would be "rampant speculation" to say this is an Assault Carrier, would it not?--[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]] 2334 6.12.06 | ||
Revision as of 02:35, December 7, 2006
Isnt this the same as Covenant Assault Carrier? -ED 02:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Don't think so. RelentlessRogue 07:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Covenant supercruiser
The covenant supercruser is not a carrier class, its a cruiser class, as the name sugests its a larger verion of a battle cruiser, it is a command cruiser -- Darth nexes 20:42, 14 November 2006
Conjecturalization
My name for this is conjecturalized. It has been listed as a large cruiser...super + cruiser = supercruiser. Cheers, RelentlessRecusantFile:Jedi Order.jpg 20:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Conjecturalized isn't a real world. To make a guess, to make something up to post speculation is something called, conjecture. -- Yamanba 06:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Votes for Deletion
- Delete this fan fiction name is mere conjecture, or speculation. Speculation is something that is banned on Halopedia. -- Yamanba 06:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep - the information on this ship is real, it is simply the name that is under dispute. It was a major plot device in the Battle of Reach, and was a large reason for the Covenant's sack of the UNSC. Like Wookieepedia does, I recommend to keep it the way it is: with the hypothesized name, but a tag listing its ambiguity, unless you have something better? Cheers, RelentlessRecusantFile:Jedi Order.jpg 16:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Unless you can prove the ship found in Halo: The Fall of Reach (page number coming to stores near you) during the Battle of Reach is without a doubt an Assault Carrier, then it would be "rampant speculation" to say this is an Assault Carrier, would it not?--Rot 2334 6.12.06