User talk:Rotaretilbo/Archive: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
m (→‎Vote: Typo fixing, replaced: [[CoH → CoH)
No edit summary
Line 47: Line 47:


Please put your letter you received from Eric Nylund into the format shown in these [[:Category:Letters of Canon|Letters of Canon]] -- [[User:Esemono|Esemono]] 05:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Please put your letter you received from Eric Nylund into the format shown in these [[:Category:Letters of Canon|Letters of Canon]] -- [[User:Esemono|Esemono]] 05:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
:I just threw it here [[Letter - RE:UNSC Ranking System]] with the other email.--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]''' 1137 9.12.06
:I just threw it here Letter - RE:UNSC Ranking System with the other email.--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]''' 1137 9.12.06
::Cool, thanks. I removed your email address and name though ... privacy and spam concerns but if you want to display them just reverse my changes. -- [[User:Esemono|Esemono]] 01:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
::Cool, thanks. I removed your email address and name though ... privacy and spam concerns but if you want to display them just reverse my changes. -- [[User:Esemono|Esemono]] 01:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


Line 490: Line 490:


--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]''' 20:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]''' 20:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
::*Yeah make a letter actually make two one for each error and use the format of [[Letter - Re:Spartan-Holly]] -- [[User:Esemono|Esemono]] 02:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
::*Yeah make a letter actually make two one for each error and use the format of Letter - Re:Spartan-Holly -- [[User:Esemono|Esemono]] 02:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)


==RE:Before someone puts a FactOrFiction template==
==RE:Before someone puts a FactOrFiction template==
Line 567: Line 567:
==RE:RE:Letters of Canon==
==RE:RE:Letters of Canon==


That was fun...I just went through and found as many links referencing Haverson and Polaski by First Lieutenant and (Petty) Warrant Officer (respectfully), then added either [[Letter - Re:Haverson]] or [[Letter - Re:Polaski]]. I'm just waiting for mass chaos to break out at the change, but then, mass chaos at correct info is better than incorrect info.--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]]''' 06:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
That was fun...I just went through and found as many links referencing Haverson and Polaski by First Lieutenant and (Petty) Warrant Officer (respectfully), then added either Letter - Re:Haverson or Letter - Re:Polaski. I'm just waiting for mass chaos to break out at the change, but then, mass chaos at correct info is better than incorrect info.--'''[[User:Rotaretilbo|Rot]]]''' 06:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
:I hope people notice too! -- [[User:Esemono|Esemono]] 04:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
:I hope people notice too! -- [[User:Esemono|Esemono]] 04:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


Line 647: Line 647:
so sorry, i also had the fought of it bieng like that, i have re-read and yes i must of written it wrong, i will change it tonight ok thanks mate, [[User:J!MMY8806|J!MMY8806]] 10:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
so sorry, i also had the fought of it bieng like that, i have re-read and yes i must of written it wrong, i will change it tonight ok thanks mate, [[User:J!MMY8806|J!MMY8806]] 10:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)


==[[Letter - Re:Polaski]]==  
==Letter - Re:Polaski==  
New talk entry on this talk page. What are your thoughts on my hypothesis? [[User:Manticore|Manticore]] 11:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
New talk entry on this talk page. What are your thoughts on my hypothesis? [[User:Manticore|Manticore]] 11:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)