Template talk:Gametype: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Crisperstorm (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Old== | |||
This is missing [[Flood (gametype)]], [[Grifball]], and other [[War Games]] multiplayer gametypes. --[[Special:Contributions/108.38.59.50|108.38.59.50]] 17:01, 22 March 2013 (EDT) | |||
:This is a public wiki and you can add such content yourself, granted there's no unregistered edit block on the page. {{User:Grizzlei/Sig}} | |||
==Visuals== | ==Visuals== | ||
I wouldn't know how to change this, but should this be updated to look a bit better visually? More along the lines of every other category with the rounded edges instead of this boxy out of place template. --[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 14:37, 19 October 2016 (EDT) | I wouldn't know how to change this, but should this be updated to look a bit better visually? More along the lines of every other category with the rounded edges instead of this boxy out of place template. --[[User:Crisperstorm|Crisperstorm]] ([[User talk:Crisperstorm|talk]]) 14:37, 19 October 2016 (EDT) | ||
:I kinda hate this template. It should only cover the default gametypes. Any variant should not be given its own article unless its fundamentally different from the default gametype, and should be covered as a simple one-liner under the default gametype article. I'll work on improving the visuals. — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 12:20, 24 October 2016 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:20, October 24, 2016
Old
This is missing Flood (gametype), Grifball, and other War Games multiplayer gametypes. --108.38.59.50 17:01, 22 March 2013 (EDT)
- This is a public wiki and you can add such content yourself, granted there's no unregistered edit block on the page. Grizzlei ♥ ツ
Visuals
I wouldn't know how to change this, but should this be updated to look a bit better visually? More along the lines of every other category with the rounded edges instead of this boxy out of place template. --Crisperstorm (talk) 14:37, 19 October 2016 (EDT)
- I kinda hate this template. It should only cover the default gametypes. Any variant should not be given its own article unless its fundamentally different from the default gametype, and should be covered as a simple one-liner under the default gametype article. I'll work on improving the visuals. — subtank 12:20, 24 October 2016 (EDT)