18,165
edits
Talk:Jul 'Mdama's Covenant: Difference between revisions
→Name
(→Name) |
NightHammer (talk | contribs) (→Name) |
||
| Line 345: | Line 345: | ||
::"Covenant (Post-war)" may be a more apt title for the Covenant remnants page, since it appears that all the separate factions are still considered part of a Covenant "bloc", while "Jul 'Mdama's Covenant" would more accurately describe this faction without creating a notion that it is the only group calling itself the "Covenant" in the post-war era.--[[User:Cyrannian|Cyrannian]] ([[User talk:Cyrannian|talk]]) 22:28, 1 May 2015 (EDT) | ::"Covenant (Post-war)" may be a more apt title for the Covenant remnants page, since it appears that all the separate factions are still considered part of a Covenant "bloc", while "Jul 'Mdama's Covenant" would more accurately describe this faction without creating a notion that it is the only group calling itself the "Covenant" in the post-war era.--[[User:Cyrannian|Cyrannian]] ([[User talk:Cyrannian|talk]]) 22:28, 1 May 2015 (EDT) | ||
:::Man, I really wish Grim just went with "New Covenant" or something (or at least told us what the UNSC calls Jul's faction). I'd love to get rid of the "faction" part in the name. "Jul 'Mdama's Covenant" might be the best at the moment, but then it kind of feels pointless since this is still a Covenant faction and the current title already accurately describes that. So, like I said, perhaps leaving as it is is the best idea for now, unless anyone has a better idea. - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 23:51, 1 May 2015 (EDT) | |||