Talk:Requiem Campaign: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:01, January 14, 2015

Rename

The battle is referred to as the "Requiem Campaign" in the new Escalation issue. Since that is more official than "Second Battle of Requiem", should we rename it? - NightHammer (talk) 22:47, 25 December 2014 (EST)

Yeah, makes more sense.--Spartacus ^{Talk • Contribs} 23:45, 25 December 2014 (EST)

Ditto. Lord Susto 00:16, 26 December 2014 (EST)

Forgot about this... so if no one else disagrees, I will rename it shortly. - NightHammer (talk) 21:03, 13 January 2015 (EST)

I agree with the proposal. Go for it, NightHammer. Noddy (talk) 21:42, 13 January 2015 (EST)

Makes sense to me, feel free to do so.262VigilantGuardian (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2015 (EST)

I'll do it.Sith-venator Wavingstrider

(Commlink) 22:17, 13 January 2015 (EST)

Then, we have to rename the First Battle of Requiem to just "Battle of Requiem", don't you think? --They're coming. They're hungry. (talk) 00:01, 14 January 2015 (EST)

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :::::Makes sense to me, feel free to do so.[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 22:02, 13 January 2015 (EST)
 ::::::I'll do it.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 22:17, 13 January 2015 (EST)
+:::::::Then, we have to rename the First Battle of Requiem to just "Battle of Requiem", don't you think? --[[User:Dr Mutran|They&#39;re coming. They&#39;re hungry.]] ([[User talk:Dr Mutran|talk]]) 00:01, 14 January 2015 (EST)