Talk:Requiem Campaign: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(→Rename) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::Forgot about this... so if no one else disagrees, I will rename it shortly. - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 21:03, 13 January 2015 (EST) | :::Forgot about this... so if no one else disagrees, I will rename it shortly. - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 21:03, 13 January 2015 (EST) | ||
::::I agree with the proposal. Go for it, NightHammer. [[User:Noddy|Noddy]] ([[User talk:Noddy|talk]]) 21:42, 13 January 2015 (EST) | ::::I agree with the proposal. Go for it, NightHammer. [[User:Noddy|Noddy]] ([[User talk:Noddy|talk]]) 21:42, 13 January 2015 (EST) | ||
:::::Makes sense to me, feel free to do so.[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 22:02, 13 January 2015 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 22:02, January 13, 2015
Rename
The battle is referred to as the "Requiem Campaign" in the new Escalation issue. Since that is more official than "Second Battle of Requiem", should we rename it? - NightHammer (talk) 22:47, 25 December 2014 (EST)
- Yeah, makes more sense.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 23:45, 25 December 2014 (EST)
- Ditto. Lord Susto 00:16, 26 December 2014 (EST)
- Forgot about this... so if no one else disagrees, I will rename it shortly. - NightHammer (talk) 21:03, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- I agree with the proposal. Go for it, NightHammer. Noddy (talk) 21:42, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- Makes sense to me, feel free to do so.262VigilantGuardian (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- I agree with the proposal. Go for it, NightHammer. Noddy (talk) 21:42, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- Forgot about this... so if no one else disagrees, I will rename it shortly. - NightHammer (talk) 21:03, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- Ditto. Lord Susto 00:16, 26 December 2014 (EST)