Template talk:Disambig header: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(Created page with "==Recent change== My bad, guys. I didn't know that every solitary template revision, no matter how small, had to be discussed before going into effect, even if said change is...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Recent change== | ==Recent change== | ||
My bad, guys. I didn't know that every solitary template revision, no matter how small, had to be discussed before going into effect, even if said change is beneficial and better than the last version. Also, you don't know what an edit war is at all, Spartacus. [[User:Noddy|Noddy]] ([[User talk:Noddy|talk]]) 23:21, 14 December 2014 (EST) | My bad, guys. I didn't know that every solitary template revision, no matter how small, had to be discussed before going into effect, even if said change is beneficial and better than the last version. Also, you don't know what an edit war is at all, Spartacus. [[User:Noddy|Noddy]] ([[User talk:Noddy|talk]]) 23:21, 14 December 2014 (EST) | ||
{{Quote|An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions, rather than trying to resolve the disagreement through discussion.|[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Edit_warring Wikipedia]}} | |||
:The above definition fits the current situation. I suggest you refrain from the sarcasm and caps in edit summaries, as users won't take you seriously when you do that. This goes as a warning to cool it.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 23:29, 14 December 2014 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 23:29, December 14, 2014
Recent change
My bad, guys. I didn't know that every solitary template revision, no matter how small, had to be discussed before going into effect, even if said change is beneficial and better than the last version. Also, you don't know what an edit war is at all, Spartacus. Noddy (talk) 23:21, 14 December 2014 (EST)
- "An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions, rather than trying to resolve the disagreement through discussion."
- — Wikipedia
- The above definition fits the current situation. I suggest you refrain from the sarcasm and caps in edit summaries, as users won't take you seriously when you do that. This goes as a warning to cool it.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 23:29, 14 December 2014 (EST)