24,589
edits
Talk:Energy sword: Difference between revisions
→Working with active camouflage/invisibility: canon or gameplay?: new section
m (Braidenvl moved page Talk:Type-1 Energy Sword to Talk:Type-1 energy sword) |
|||
| Line 279: | Line 279: | ||
Does anyone know if the Energy Sword is going to be usable in the [[Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary|remake]] of Halo 1? It would be nice if that could be changed to become possible. A nice, new feature previously not possible to do. [[User talk:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] 22:06, 29 August 2011 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | Does anyone know if the Energy Sword is going to be usable in the [[Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary|remake]] of Halo 1? It would be nice if that could be changed to become possible. A nice, new feature previously not possible to do. [[User talk:Xamikaze330|Xamikaze330]] 22:06, 29 August 2011 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | ||
== Working with active camouflage/invisibility: canon or gameplay? == | |||
I wanted to amend the article's gameplay section and/or trivia by adding a sentence somewhere along the lines of the above topic but I couldn't find any conclusive evidence that an energy sword can be covered by active camouflage/invisibility. | |||
To look back, the energy sword in H1 and H2 is not covered by the ability, to which I think should be the canon position. This is confirmed in ''Forward unto Dawn'' when the invisible Zealot was wielding the weapon and in ''Headhunters'' with the special Special Operations Sangheili team with blood-red swords. The only media where the sword is covered by the ability can only be found in the gameplay of H3, HR and H4. | |||
Anyone else can find something stronger to confirm this, that, in canon, the energy sword cannot be covered by active camouflage/invisibility? — <span style="font-size:14px; font-family:Arial;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 10:00, 16 August 2015 (EDT) | |||