Talk:CAA Heavy Burden: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Imrane-117 (talk | contribs) |
Shazamikaze (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Probably just a mistake on 343i's part (the 2012 E3 build had it designated as a frigate, so it's likely they just forgot to remove the "UNSC" from the hull). Anyways, I'd rather go with the map description.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 12:32, 10 June 2013 (EDT) | :Probably just a mistake on 343i's part (the 2012 E3 build had it designated as a frigate, so it's likely they just forgot to remove the "UNSC" from the hull). Anyways, I'd rather go with the map description.--{{User:Spartacus/Sig}} 12:32, 10 June 2013 (EDT) | ||
::Fair enough. Still, it does kinda irritate me. Sometimes I hate my freaking perfectionist tendencies. --'''''[[User:Xamikaze330|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Halo;">Xamikaze330</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Xamikaze330|<font color="Blue">Transmit</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|<font color="Green">Files</font>]]''''']</small> 12:34, 10 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | ::Fair enough. Still, it does kinda irritate me. Sometimes I hate my freaking perfectionist tendencies. --'''''[[User:Xamikaze330|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Halo;">Xamikaze330</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Xamikaze330|<font color="Blue">Transmit</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|<font color="Green">Files</font>]]''''']</small> 12:34, 10 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330 | ||
:::In the infobox, it is stated that the era is "Second Human-Covenant War", shouldn't it be "Human-Covenant War"? (The only thing we know about it is that it participated in the Battle of Kholo) | :::In the infobox, it is stated that the era is "Second Human-Covenant War", shouldn't it be "Human-Covenant War"? (The only thing we know about it is that it participated in the Battle of Kholo). {{Unsigned|Imrane-117}} | ||
==Possible New Content Information?== | |||
Why was the New Content template removed? I put it there because Stephen Loftus speculated that there may possibly be new information coming soon, what with the ''Halo 4: Essential Visual Guide'' coming out in September this year. But it is just speculation. Another thing I'm speculating/wondering is, was or is the ship presumed lost? But still, maybe we should err on the side of caution... --'''''[[User:Xamikaze330|<span style="color:Black; font-family: Halo;">Xamikaze330</span>]]''''' <small>['''''[[User talk:Xamikaze330|<font color="Blue">Transmit</font>]]'''''|'''''[[Special:Contributions/Xamikaze330|<font color="Green">Files</font>]]''''']</small> 12:49, 10 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330 |
Revision as of 12:49, June 10, 2013
CAA, or UNSC?
If it's supposed to be CAA, then why does it say on the hull UNSC? This can easily be very confusing. --Xamikaze330 [Transmit|Files] 12:29, 10 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330
- Probably just a mistake on 343i's part (the 2012 E3 build had it designated as a frigate, so it's likely they just forgot to remove the "UNSC" from the hull). Anyways, I'd rather go with the map description.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 12:32, 10 June 2013 (EDT)
- Fair enough. Still, it does kinda irritate me. Sometimes I hate my freaking perfectionist tendencies. --Xamikaze330 [Transmit|Files] 12:34, 10 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330
- In the infobox, it is stated that the era is "Second Human-Covenant War", shouldn't it be "Human-Covenant War"? (The only thing we know about it is that it participated in the Battle of Kholo). —This unsigned comment was made by Imrane-117 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
- Fair enough. Still, it does kinda irritate me. Sometimes I hate my freaking perfectionist tendencies. --Xamikaze330 [Transmit|Files] 12:34, 10 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330
Possible New Content Information?
Why was the New Content template removed? I put it there because Stephen Loftus speculated that there may possibly be new information coming soon, what with the Halo 4: Essential Visual Guide coming out in September this year. But it is just speculation. Another thing I'm speculating/wondering is, was or is the ship presumed lost? But still, maybe we should err on the side of caution... --Xamikaze330 [Transmit|Files] 12:49, 10 June 2013 (EDT)Xamikaze330