Talk:Covenant army: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Killamin7i (talk | contribs) m (Moved discussion to forums: How in the world is anyone supposed to read that??) |
m (Braidenvl moved page Talk:Covenant Army to Talk:Covenant army: There's no proof that "Covenant army" is a proper in-universe title.) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 16:59, May 27, 2013
On the introduced during great schism, the weapons were around before. Brute Shots, Spikers and Gravity Hammers have been mentioned before in books, a brute shot killing a spartan, Tartarus wielding a spiker, and well, HW and HR confirm the gravity hammer, and Maccebus's Fist of Rukt in CH). So should we fix it?69.144.238.157 22:09, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
War against humanity
Yo, Subtank I dont want an edit war so I'd just thought Id argue it over here... Errr may I ask why the thing i wrote on war against humanity got removed, its just that I thought it might give some insight on how the covenant army do against the humans an all that and I didnt make it biased in favour of the covenant I tried to do it from a neutral POV. So yeah, please reply when your ready.
- Amended.— subtank 14:17, 8 April 2011 (EDT)
Ok, thanks and goodly worded too... --CookieMonstersayshello 14:32, 8 April 2011 (EDT)
- Note, just click that signature button once. You don't need to write your username after that. :P — subtank 14:37, 8 April 2011 (EDT)
K--CookieMonstersayshello 15:42, 8 April 2011 (EDT)
Why cant we just revert it to this:
"The Covenant army play an important role in Covenant campaigns against humans and consist mostly of Unggoy and Kig-Yar (with a few Sangheili or Jiralhanae commanding them) and whilst they are considerably weaker than the humans, the other species though less in number, generally fare much better than the UNSC in combat situations. However, the presence of a Spartan or a special tactical manouver on the UNSC's part could easily swing the tide of the battle in their favour... "
--CookieMonstersayshello 09:55, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
- The very reason why I revert your edits is simply because those additions do not focus at all to the history, but more towards the "behaviour" of the branch. That edit should be more on the Covenant Empire article on military campaign (i.e. Covenant_Empire#Military.— subtank 10:36, 5 August 2011 (EDT)
Kk, sorry about that Subtank. --CookieMonstersayshello 07:54, 6 August 2011 (EDT)