Talk:Fall of Reach: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

Line 283: Line 283:


Hmm makes a lot of sense actually. Well done. <font color="Blue"><big>'''Helljumper'''</big> <small>[[User:II Helljumper II|U]] [[User talk:II Helljumper II|T]] [[Special:Editcount/II_Helljumper_II|C]]</small></font> [[File:M6G Cropped.png|30px]]
Hmm makes a lot of sense actually. Well done. <font color="Blue"><big>'''Helljumper'''</big> <small>[[User:II Helljumper II|U]] [[User talk:II Helljumper II|T]] [[Special:Editcount/II_Helljumper_II|C]]</small></font> [[File:M6G Cropped.png|30px]]
:This theory does make a lot of sense. The only problem I have with it is that the way I see it, your math is dependent on Reach and Earth having coordinated new years' days for the year 2552; for instance, 1/1/2552 on Reach must be the same day as 1/1/2552 on Earth, which they probably don't, in order for the 15 day difference to be taken into account. Otherwise, the actual date difference could be much different depending on which specific date Reach and Earth were initially coordinated at. But even in that case, the year on Reach could not have been 2552 since a Reach year is roughly ~1700 hours (about 70-ish Earth/60-ish Reach days) or so longer than an Earth year, which I think messes up the entire timeline according to the game since it does use Reach time, which we've established it does. I think at this point we just need someone official to clear up the date/time system used by the UNSC for its local colonies and how it relates to the game. --[[User talk:Darthkillyou|-dky]] 02:20, October 1, 2010 (UTC)


== temporal anomaly? ==
== temporal anomaly? ==