Talk:Bullfrogs: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
Forerunner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Reverted edits by Butthead4 (Talk) to last version by Tuckerscreator) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::Jetpacks are complicated. They probably thought that they were heading to the platform high and fast enough to land without it on, but the loss of momentum leads them to fail.-- [[User talk:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 17:18, 31 December 2010 (EST) | :::Jetpacks are complicated. They probably thought that they were heading to the platform high and fast enough to land without it on, but the loss of momentum leads them to fail.-- [[User talk:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 17:18, 31 December 2010 (EST) | ||
It's also partially because of gameplay. Their jumps are all pre-set so they may just end up standing in the wrong place and jumping down because of it. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 17:45, 31 December 2010 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 19:41, July 20, 2011
Has anyone noticed how terribly the bullfrogs use their jet packs sometimes?--One who survived 20:45, 20 December 2010 (EST)
- Yeah, but maybe Spartans just use their jet packs really well. pestilence Phil, pestilence! 21:59, 20 December 2010 (EST)
- No, when I say "terribly" I mean like landing straight in a group of brutes, or flying toward a platform only to miss their perch and fall to their death. Things that an elite group of shock troopers should know how to do.--One who survived 17:08, 31 December 2010 (EST)
- Jetpacks are complicated. They probably thought that they were heading to the platform high and fast enough to land without it on, but the loss of momentum leads them to fail.-- Forerunner 17:18, 31 December 2010 (EST)
It's also partially because of gameplay. Their jumps are all pre-set so they may just end up standing in the wrong place and jumping down because of it. Tuckerscreator(stalk) 17:45, 31 December 2010 (EST)