Talk:Battle of the Citadel: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
m (→Deletion: Link cleanup, replaced: Battle of the Apex → Battle of Trove, Shield 0459| → Trove|) |
|||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Deletion== | ==Deletion== | ||
{{Support}} The engagement was just one of several skirmishes that made up the overall battle. This engagement was never explicitly named, as small scale fights within larger battles are rarely given that distinction. -- | {{Support}} The engagement was just one of several skirmishes that made up the overall battle. This engagement was never explicitly named, as small scale fights within larger battles are rarely given that distinction. --'''[[User:ED|<font color="black">E</font>]][[User talk:ED|<font color="black">D</font>]]File:ArmyROTC.gif|15px]]''' 22:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Alright then, if that's true, why do we still have [[Battle of Voi]], [[Battle of the Silent Cartographer]], [[Second Battle of High Charity]], etc. | ::Alright then, if that's true, why do we still have [[Battle of Voi]], [[Battle of the Silent Cartographer]], [[Second Battle of High Charity]], etc. File:CT's Battle Flag - Distressed.JPG|25px]] [[User:CommanderTony|<font color="black">'''Anthony I]]'''</font> [[User:CommanderTony|'''<font color="silver">of the</font>]]''' '''[[Halopedia:Administrators|<font color="crimson">United States]]</font>'''<sup>[[User Talk:CommanderTony|'''<font color="black">Talk]]</font>'''</sup> 2/25/2008 | ||
{{Oppose}} Per CT; [[Raid on the Truth and Reconciliation|Raid on the ''Truth and Reconciliation'']] was never explicitly named, but has survived deletion since late October. And any notability claim is rather false; both the Raid and the Citadel battle are quite notable, with each of them concerning major objects in the Haloverse. The Raid on the TaR involved the capture of a major Covenant ship, and the Battle of the Citadel led to Truth's death and thus the disbanding of the Covenant. <span title="I am not an employee of Wikia.">Çya</span>, [[ | ::Deletion is a bit much, I think it would be better to ''merge'' them. [[User talk:Halo-343|Halo-343]] 12:33, 24 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
{{Oppose}} Per CT; [[Raid on the Truth and Reconciliation|Raid on the ''Truth and Reconciliation'']] was never explicitly named, but has survived deletion since late October. And any notability claim is rather false; both the Raid and the Citadel battle are quite notable, with each of them concerning major objects in the Haloverse. The Raid on the TaR involved the capture of a major Covenant ship, and the Battle of the Citadel led to Truth's death and thus the disbanding of the Covenant. <span title="I am not an employee of Wikia.">Çya</span>, [[halowikia:User:Mouse among men|<font color="black">M</font>]][[halowikia:User talk:Mouse among men|<font color="black">ø</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Mouse among men|<font color="black">u</font>]][[halowikia:Halopedia:Parasite of Halopedia|<font color="black">s</font>]][[halowikia:User:Mouse among men/Sandbox|<font color="black">e</font>]] 00:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{Oppose}} We should keep them. If we redirect them to larger articles, it's just gonna get downsized. I don't want to read the Battle of the Citadel "In a Nutshell," with all of the information about it being... "with an attack on the Citadel finaly ending the war." hm... It seems someone had deleted the "Truth and Reconciliation" and the "Assault on the Control Room" battle articles. No information saying why. All I'm getting on IRC is KillerCRS saying that they arn't battles and should be removed. Coincidentaly, both '''didn't''' have "Battle of" in their names either.[[User:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 15:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
{{oppose}} - As per Forerunner. - [[User:JEA13|<font color="orange">'''JEA13'''</font>]] <sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:JEA13|<font color="orange">iTalk</font>]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 13:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
{{Oppose}} I guess it's notable enough. The thing i care about is, it's treated like a '''part''' of the [[Battle of the Ark]] like it should be, not separate from it. As opposed to the [[Battle of Trove|Battle of the Flood-controlled Shield World]] and [[Battle of Trove]] debate. --[[User talk:Jugus|Jugus]] 14:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 13:33, May 29, 2022
Deletion[edit]
Support The engagement was just one of several skirmishes that made up the overall battle. This engagement was never explicitly named, as small scale fights within larger battles are rarely given that distinction. --EDFile:ArmyROTC.gif|15px]] 22:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- Alright then, if that's true, why do we still have Battle of Voi, Battle of the Silent Cartographer, Second Battle of High Charity, etc. File:CT's Battle Flag - Distressed.JPG|25px]] Anthony I of the United StatesTalk 2/25/2008
- Deletion is a bit much, I think it would be better to merge them. Halo-343 12:33, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Per CT; Raid on the Truth and Reconciliation was never explicitly named, but has survived deletion since late October. And any notability claim is rather false; both the Raid and the Citadel battle are quite notable, with each of them concerning major objects in the Haloverse. The Raid on the TaR involved the capture of a major Covenant ship, and the Battle of the Citadel led to Truth's death and thus the disbanding of the Covenant. Çya, Møuse 00:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Oppose We should keep them. If we redirect them to larger articles, it's just gonna get downsized. I don't want to read the Battle of the Citadel "In a Nutshell," with all of the information about it being... "with an attack on the Citadel finaly ending the war." hm... It seems someone had deleted the "Truth and Reconciliation" and the "Assault on the Control Room" battle articles. No information saying why. All I'm getting on IRC is KillerCRS saying that they arn't battles and should be removed. Coincidentaly, both didn't have "Battle of" in their names either.Forerunner 15:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Oppose - As per Forerunner. - JEA13 [iTalk] 13:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I guess it's notable enough. The thing i care about is, it's treated like a part of the Battle of the Ark like it should be, not separate from it. As opposed to the Battle of the Flood-controlled Shield World and Battle of Trove debate. --Jugus 14:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)