Talk:Halberd-class light destroyer: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
NightHammer (talk | contribs) |
BaconShelf (talk | contribs) m (BaconShelf moved page Talk:Halberd-class destroyer to Talk:Halberd-class light destroyer without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::No, that should be good enough. The reference is to page 19 which in my version is just a mostly blank page with PART 1 written on it. I checked the next page with text, page 21, but there's no description of the destroyer. If you could reference the portion that refers to the arrow shape of the hull, that will be sufficient to cement this as a Halberd-class I think. -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 16:02, 21 February 2015 (EST) | ::No, that should be good enough. The reference is to page 19 which in my version is just a mostly blank page with PART 1 written on it. I checked the next page with text, page 21, but there's no description of the destroyer. If you could reference the portion that refers to the arrow shape of the hull, that will be sufficient to cement this as a Halberd-class I think. -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 16:02, 21 February 2015 (EST) | ||
:::Page 26 (I referenced the page in the article itself in the "Superstructure and hull" section). I just used page 19 as a generic reference for the ship itself, although that could be changed. - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 16:10, 21 February 2015 (EST) | :::Page 26 (I referenced the page in the article itself in the "Superstructure and hull" section). I just used page 19 as a generic reference for the ship itself, although that could be changed. - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 16:10, 21 February 2015 (EST) | ||
::::The reference to page 26 would do it. Nice find! -[[User:ScaleMaster117|ScaleMaster117]] ([[User talk:ScaleMaster117|talk]]) 16:12, 21 February 2015 (EST) | |||
== More than two pelicans == | |||
In Halo:Oblivion the destroyer Chaco is said to send four pelicans to Netherop to investigate the lucky break. they could be D75s. Should we add this to the complement section? | |||
[[User:King Under The Mountain|King Under The Mountain]] ([[User talk:King Under The Mountain|talk]]) 22:57, October 26, 2019 (EDT)King Under The Mountain | |||
:The Pelicans were indeed D75s. If there were four, we should definitely mention that. [[User:CMDR RileySV|CMDR RileySV]] ([[User talk:CMDR RileySV|talk]]) 20:50, November 1, 2019 (EDT) | |||
"The ''Chaco'' sent its Pelicans down to take a look," he said. "Only one of them made it back, but it had a vid of the other one taking fire from the ''Lucky Break'''s pulse lasers." | |||
<br> | |||
This counts for only two Pelicans, which fits in line with the existing number. The only mention of four Pelicans I can find is related to the extraction, which states that the Pantea would probably send four Pelicans to extract them. I've changed it back to two, since there's no clear evidence to say that any individual ship has more than this. [[User:Corey-067|Corey-067]] ([[User talk:Corey-067|talk]]) 22:58, April 7, 2021 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 18:54, April 11, 2022
Armageddon's Edge[edit]
I can't find any link between the UNSC Armageddon's Edge and the Halberd-class destroyer. There are approximately 4 different destroyer class ships in the Halo fiction. What is the exact qualifying reference for this ship? -ScaleMaster117 (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2015 (EST)
- The description of the Armageddon's Edge is very similar to other Halberd-class destroyers, most notably the description of its arrowhead-shaped nose. Honestly, when I wrote the article I also confused the Armageddon's Edge with the Iroquois, as I mistakenly believed that the Armageddon's Edge is the ship that Keyes' described as being seven meters longer than a Stalwart-class. Still, I think the description of the Armageddon's Edge should be enough to qualify it as being a ship of this class. If not, feel free to remove all references to The Cole Protocol in the article. - NightHammer (talk) 15:53, 21 February 2015 (EST)
- No, that should be good enough. The reference is to page 19 which in my version is just a mostly blank page with PART 1 written on it. I checked the next page with text, page 21, but there's no description of the destroyer. If you could reference the portion that refers to the arrow shape of the hull, that will be sufficient to cement this as a Halberd-class I think. -ScaleMaster117 (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2015 (EST)
- Page 26 (I referenced the page in the article itself in the "Superstructure and hull" section). I just used page 19 as a generic reference for the ship itself, although that could be changed. - NightHammer (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2015 (EST)
- The reference to page 26 would do it. Nice find! -ScaleMaster117 (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2015 (EST)
- Page 26 (I referenced the page in the article itself in the "Superstructure and hull" section). I just used page 19 as a generic reference for the ship itself, although that could be changed. - NightHammer (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2015 (EST)
- No, that should be good enough. The reference is to page 19 which in my version is just a mostly blank page with PART 1 written on it. I checked the next page with text, page 21, but there's no description of the destroyer. If you could reference the portion that refers to the arrow shape of the hull, that will be sufficient to cement this as a Halberd-class I think. -ScaleMaster117 (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2015 (EST)
More than two pelicans[edit]
In Halo:Oblivion the destroyer Chaco is said to send four pelicans to Netherop to investigate the lucky break. they could be D75s. Should we add this to the complement section? King Under The Mountain (talk) 22:57, October 26, 2019 (EDT)King Under The Mountain
- The Pelicans were indeed D75s. If there were four, we should definitely mention that. CMDR RileySV (talk) 20:50, November 1, 2019 (EDT)
"The Chaco sent its Pelicans down to take a look," he said. "Only one of them made it back, but it had a vid of the other one taking fire from the Lucky Break's pulse lasers."
This counts for only two Pelicans, which fits in line with the existing number. The only mention of four Pelicans I can find is related to the extraction, which states that the Pantea would probably send four Pelicans to extract them. I've changed it back to two, since there's no clear evidence to say that any individual ship has more than this. Corey-067 (talk) 22:58, April 7, 2021 (EDT)