Talk:Requiem Campaign: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::::I agree with the proposal. Go for it, NightHammer. [[User:Noddy|Noddy]] ([[User talk:Noddy|talk]]) 21:42, 13 January 2015 (EST) | ::::I agree with the proposal. Go for it, NightHammer. [[User:Noddy|Noddy]] ([[User talk:Noddy|talk]]) 21:42, 13 January 2015 (EST) | ||
:::::Makes sense to me, feel free to do so.[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 22:02, 13 January 2015 (EST) | :::::Makes sense to me, feel free to do so.[[User:262VigilantGuardian|262VigilantGuardian]] ([[User talk:262VigilantGuardian|talk]]) 22:02, 13 January 2015 (EST) | ||
::::::I'll do it.[[User:Sith Venator|<span style="color:green">Sith-venator Wavingstrider</span>]] [[File:Fett helmet.jpg|20px]] ([[User talk:Sith Venator|<span style="color:blue">Commlink</span>]]) 22:17, 13 January 2015 (EST) | |||
:::::::Then, we have to rename the First Battle of Requiem to just "Battle of Requiem", don't you think? --[[User:Dr Mutran|They're coming. They're hungry.]] ([[User talk:Dr Mutran|talk]]) 00:01, 14 January 2015 (EST) | |||
::::::::Make it so. [[User:Lord Susto|<span style="color:orange">Lord Susto</span>]] 00:05, 14 January 2015 (EST) | |||
:::::::::Agreed. - [[User:NightHammer|NightHammer]] ([[User talk:NightHammer|talk]]) 00:07, 14 January 2015 (EST) | |||
All of those redirects now... *shivers* [[User:Noddy|Noddy]] ([[User talk:Noddy|talk]]) 00:38, 14 January 2015 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:38, January 14, 2015
Rename[edit]
The battle is referred to as the "Requiem Campaign" in the new Escalation issue. Since that is more official than "Second Battle of Requiem", should we rename it? - NightHammer (talk) 22:47, 25 December 2014 (EST)
- Yeah, makes more sense.--Spartacus Talk • Contribs 23:45, 25 December 2014 (EST)
- Ditto. Lord Susto 00:16, 26 December 2014 (EST)
- Forgot about this... so if no one else disagrees, I will rename it shortly. - NightHammer (talk) 21:03, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- I agree with the proposal. Go for it, NightHammer. Noddy (talk) 21:42, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- Makes sense to me, feel free to do so.262VigilantGuardian (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- I'll do it.Sith-venator Wavingstrider
(Commlink) 22:17, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- Then, we have to rename the First Battle of Requiem to just "Battle of Requiem", don't you think? --They're coming. They're hungry. (talk) 00:01, 14 January 2015 (EST)
- Make it so. Lord Susto 00:05, 14 January 2015 (EST)
- Agreed. - NightHammer (talk) 00:07, 14 January 2015 (EST)
- Make it so. Lord Susto 00:05, 14 January 2015 (EST)
- Then, we have to rename the First Battle of Requiem to just "Battle of Requiem", don't you think? --They're coming. They're hungry. (talk) 00:01, 14 January 2015 (EST)
- I'll do it.Sith-venator Wavingstrider
- Makes sense to me, feel free to do so.262VigilantGuardian (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- I agree with the proposal. Go for it, NightHammer. Noddy (talk) 21:42, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- Forgot about this... so if no one else disagrees, I will rename it shortly. - NightHammer (talk) 21:03, 13 January 2015 (EST)
- Ditto. Lord Susto 00:16, 26 December 2014 (EST)
All of those redirects now... *shivers* Noddy (talk) 00:38, 14 January 2015 (EST)