Talk:Mount Erebus: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:10, March 30, 2012

Votes for Deletion

Keep —This unsigned comment was made by 209.81.123.229 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
Keep - Worth a mention. =D Cheers, RelentlessRecusant ^TALK • WORK • _SPEAK 21:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Keep - as per above File:UoH.gif File:Lieutenant General insignia.png The Lieutenant General 21:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Well thats settled :)-User:SPARTAN-077
over and out- April 8, 9:38, 2007

Well, it could use cleanup or it's a stub. --Blemo ^TALK • _{CONTRIBUTIONS} 05:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Deletion

A simple mention warrants an article? I think not. Ross Island article can simply have a wikipedia link to Mount Erebus. In fact, Im gonna do that right now.HA came 20:43, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

It wasn't a simple mention. The Covenant were searching for artifacts at Mount Erebus, so it should stay--File:Colonel Grade One.png Col. Spartacus ^{Talk Page} _{Contributions} ^Contact 20:48, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

It's a simple mention not more than two sentences in the book. How is that even notable? Such information can be covered in the parent article, which is the Ross Island article. This is simply promoting redundancy. HA came 20:52, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

Edit: I would appreciate it if you could stop from jumping the gun and hitting the revert button/undoing people's edit before people reach a consensus... you simply promoting an edit-war.. 9_9 HA came 20:58, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

It takes two to edit war, bro.--File:Colonel Grade One.png Col. Spartacus ^{Talk Page} _{Contributions} ^Contact 21:06, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

Ok, Bro. I'll play by your rule. Notability policy requires that

"Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material. In short, apply the "Trivial" test.

This article does not meet this test; it's trivial, mentioned in a single sentence, and pretty much of it can be covered in Ross Island article. So, bro, how 'bout it? HA came 21:10, 30 March 2012 (EDT)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ::Edit: I would appreciate it if you could stop from jumping the gun and hitting the revert button/undoing people's edit before people reach a consensus... you simply promoting an edit-war.. 9_9 [[User:Hacame|<span class="plainlinks" style="color:#483C32; font-family:lucida console; font-size:18px;">HA</span>]][[User talk:Hacame|<span class="plainlinks" style="color:#483C32; font-family:lucida console; font-size:15px;">came</span>]] 20:58, 30 March 2012 (EDT)
 :::It takes two to edit war, bro.--[[Image:Colonel Grade One.png|20px]] ''[[Help:User Levels|<span style="color:Black; font-weight:bold; font-family:Arial">Col.</span>]] [[User:Spartacus|<span style="color:Black; font-weight:bold; font-family:Arial">Spartacus</span>]]  <sup>[[User talk:Spartacus|<font color="Grey">'''Talk Page'''</font>]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Spartacus|<font color="Grey">Contributions</font>]]</sub> <sup>[[Special:Emailuser/Spartacus|<font color="Grey">Contact</font>]]''</sup> 21:06, 30 March 2012 (EDT)
+::::Ok, ''Bro''. I'll play by your rule. Notability policy requires that <code>"Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material. In short, apply the "Trivial" test.</code> This article does not meet this test; it's trivial, mentioned in a single sentence, and pretty much of it can be covered in Ross Island article. So, ''bro'', how 'bout it? [[User:Hacame|<span class="plainlinks" style="color:#483C32; font-family:lucida console; font-size:18px;">HA</span>]][[User talk:Hacame|<span class="plainlinks" style="color:#483C32; font-family:lucida console; font-size:15px;">came</span>]] 21:10, 30 March 2012 (EDT)