User talk:REACHSURVIVES: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

(Fail)
(→‎Fanon on UserWiki: new section)
Line 42: Line 42:
Thanks
Thanks
[[User talk:REACHSURVIVES|REACHSURVIVES]] 06:19, 7 December 2011 (EST)
[[User talk:REACHSURVIVES|REACHSURVIVES]] 06:19, 7 December 2011 (EST)
== Fanon on UserWiki ==
Hi just a note that Halopedia has a strict no fanon policy on User pages/UserWikis.--'''''[[Help:User Levels|<span style="color:green">Commander</span>]]''''' [[User:Halofan1234|<span style="color:red">Halofan1234</span>]] (''[[User talk:Halofan1234|<span style="color:purple">I say</span>]]'' ''[[Special:Contributions/Halofan1234|<span style="color:purple">the cabal</span>]]'' ''[[Special:Editcount/Halofan1234|<span style"color:purple">does not exist</span>]]'') 00:00, 10 December 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 00:00, December 10, 2011

--REACHSURVIVES 20:24, 5 December 2011 (EST)


Recruiting

I'm thinking of creating a group that would study, improve, and work on pages, using extra information gathered form modding or other uses. If you have an idea, or wish to join, please add me as a friend or send me a message. By trying out new ideas, we could expose glitches, loopholes, and other things that would make HALOPEDIA evenbetter than before. If you want to improve a great wiki, then join this group. Names, logistics, and rules can be worked out at a latter date. Please Join.

From

REACHSURVIVES 20:24, 5 December 2011 (EST)

We actually used to have usergroups on Halopedia, but they were disbanded back in 2009.--Commander Halofan1234 (I say the cabal does not exist) 21:27, 5 December 2011 (EST)


I'm pretty new at this, so why were the usergroups disbanded? Are they allowed to be formed once disbanded?

REACHSURVIVES 06:35, 6 December 2011 (EST)

I believe it was found that the usergroups were not as effective as they should've been. Some people mostly joined them just to be in a group with a theme they liked.--File:1221751884 I-animated-this-for-you.gifEnder the XenocideFile:1221751884 I-animated-this-for-you.gif 07:42, 6 December 2011 (EST)


So if the groups were more effective, wouldn't the usergroups not disband and do some good? I wouldent be the leader of course, but it could still work, couldn't it?

REACHSURVIVES 15:48, 6 December 2011 (EST)

The original idea of the usergroup was to encourage editing. Each group, centred around a different Halo theme, would set goals for article improvement. Then the point system arrived, and as it turned out, the attraction of "ranking up" got a lot more people editing than the groups, so they closed.--The All-knowing Sith'ari 15:52, 6 December 2011 (EST)


Couldn't the usergroups begin again since ranking up will be accomplished as you work in the usergroups? That would make sense.

REACHSURVIVES 16:38, 6 December 2011 (EST)


Now I understand why the usergroups were disbanded. Maybe if we could prove to the council that smaller usergroups would work. Does anyone have an idea of how to contact them and tell them this? Anyone? PLEASE?

REACHSURVIVES 20:46, 6 December 2011 (EST)

The usergroups are not active anymore at all. If you wan to contact the administration about this then see here: Special:Userlist/sysop. P.S. The content about the the strategies against The Covenant factions should be moved to your UserWiki, as it's not really allowed on the talk page.--Commander Halofan1234 (I say the cabal does not exist) 21:58, 6 December 2011 (EST)

Thanks REACHSURVIVES 06:19, 7 December 2011 (EST)

Fanon on UserWiki

Hi just a note that Halopedia has a strict no fanon policy on User pages/UserWikis.--Commander Halofan1234 (I say the cabal does not exist) 00:00, 10 December 2011 (EST)