15,413
edits
User talk:ProfessorStalhmanSaysHello: Difference between revisions
→Re: some gibberish
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
another direct quote you said in favour of Elite tactics "The Sangheili-led siege on Alpha Base in an example of Sangheili tactics - they tricked the Marines into believing that they were a Pelican making its way in, when in actuality they were an armed force sent in to kill John-117. Going around killing people in close-quarters combat doesn't mean that you aren't a strategist - Sangheili have such a big advantage in CQC that they simply don't need to be tactical in such engagements, though neither does this mean that they don't use strategic tactics" --[[User talk:ProfessorStalhmanSaysHello|ProfessorStalhmanSaysHello]] 10:30, 13 August 2011 (EDT) Not very consistent in your arguments are you. | another direct quote you said in favour of Elite tactics "The Sangheili-led siege on Alpha Base in an example of Sangheili tactics - they tricked the Marines into believing that they were a Pelican making its way in, when in actuality they were an armed force sent in to kill John-117. Going around killing people in close-quarters combat doesn't mean that you aren't a strategist - Sangheili have such a big advantage in CQC that they simply don't need to be tactical in such engagements, though neither does this mean that they don't use strategic tactics" --[[User talk:ProfessorStalhmanSaysHello|ProfessorStalhmanSaysHello]] 10:30, 13 August 2011 (EDT) Not very consistent in your arguments are you. | ||
:Why do I find it odd that you're having the same debate that CookieMonster was having...--[[User:Halofan1234|ハローファン]] ([[User talk:Halofan1234|H1234-NET]]) 11:23, 13 August 2011 (EDT) | |||