Talk:Bungie's April Fools jokes: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:I agree with Jugus. - [[User:JEA13|<font color="orange">'''JEA13'''</font>]] <sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:JEA13|<font color="orange">iTalk</font>]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 15:10, April 9, 2010 (UTC) | :I agree with Jugus. - [[User:JEA13|<font color="orange">'''JEA13'''</font>]] <sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:JEA13|<font color="orange">iTalk</font>]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 15:10, April 9, 2010 (UTC) | ||
Anyone have an idea what they did this year, i.e. yesterday. Sorry it's so short notice. --[[User talk:Felix-119|Felix-119]] 19:18, 1 April 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:18, April 1, 2011
Deletion Discussion
In my opinion, we could keep this page. It's close enough to Halo since most of the jokes are directly Halo-related and some of them quite elaborate - like the last one. It's better to have them all on one page rather than having them scattered around or not mentioning them at all. Besides, we already have loads of other Bungie-related pages that have even less to do with Halo than this one. I'm not saying they should be deleted, but that it doesn't really hurt having them. --Jugus (Talk | Contribs) 13:47, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
- I completely agree, we have dozens of Bungie-related articles, most of which are barely Halo-related at all. This should stay. - File:Black Mesa.jpg Halo-343 (Talk) (Contribs) (Edits) 13:50, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
- I say we keep it. It fits in fine, not doing any damage, not conjecture, and as both of you have stated, it is halo related. DarkbelowHGR CommbandD 14:19, April 9, 2010 (UTC)
Anyone have an idea what they did this year, i.e. yesterday. Sorry it's so short notice. --Felix-119 19:18, 1 April 2011 (EDT)