Talk:CAA Butterworth: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:11, January 22, 2011

Is there a reason that this ship should not be categorized by its name? I had done so, but Stryker117 removed it. Just curious. Auguststorm1945 15:43, 22 January 2011 (EST)

The prefix shouldn't be used in categorisation - otherwise, both the Template:UNSCship and Template:UNSCship would share a position within "U".-- Forerunner 16:05, 22 January 2011 (EST)

Forerunner: I think you've misinterpreted and haven't checked the logs; what Auguststorm is doing is categorising them by omitting the prefix (i.e. included Butterworth instead of CAA Butterwortd). — subtank ^(7alk) 16:11, 22 January 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 17:05, January 22, 2011 (edit) Forerunner (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:11, January 22, 2011 (edit) (undo) Subtank (talk \| contribs) mNo edit summary Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:The prefix shouldn't be used in categorisation - otherwise, both the {{UNSCship\|Aegis Fate}} and {{UNSCship\|Forward Unto Dawn}} would share a position within "U".-- [[User talk:Forerunner\|Forerunner]] 16:05, 22 January 2011 (EST)		:The prefix shouldn't be used in categorisation - otherwise, both the {{UNSCship\|Aegis Fate}} and {{UNSCship\|Forward Unto Dawn}} would share a position within "U".-- [[User talk:Forerunner\|Forerunner]] 16:05, 22 January 2011 (EST)

			::Forerunner: I think you've misinterpreted and haven't checked the logs; what Auguststorm is doing is categorising them by omitting the prefix (i.e. included Butterworth instead of CAA Butterwortd). — <span style="font-size:200%; font-family:Freestyle Script;">[[User:Subtank\|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Subtank\|<span style="color:#ED9121;">7alk</span>]])</sup></span> 16:11, 22 January 2011 (EST)