User talk:The All-knowing Sith'ari: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
(Even I'm guilty of it! This is going to be one heckuva job...) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Removing Categories == | == Removing Categories == | ||
If you don't mind me asking, why are you removing the | If you don't mind me asking, why are you removing the UNSC Category from pages such as [[UNSC Calcutta]]? I can see with some of the edits, where you change the category, but wouldn't it be better to add the new categories, seeing as they fall into both? --<span style="color:mediumpurple;">[[User:DKong|DKong]] <sup>[[User_talk:DKong|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/DKong|Cont]]</sup></span> 13:39, 12 December 2010 (EST) | ||
:Because it's counter productive in terms of organisation; half of the articles are either Covenant or UNSC origin, so why add such useless category?- <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 13:45, 12 December 2010 (EST) | :Because it's counter productive in terms of organisation; half of the articles are either Covenant or UNSC origin, so why add such useless category?- <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 13:45, 12 December 2010 (EST) | ||
::What Subtank said.--[[User talk:The All-knowing Sith'ari|The All-knowing Sith'ari]] 14:54, 12 December 2010 (EST) | ::What Subtank said.--[[User talk:The All-knowing Sith'ari|The All-knowing Sith'ari]] 14:54, 12 December 2010 (EST) |
Revision as of 11:45, January 8, 2011
|
-EDFile:ArmyROTC.gif 17:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Removing Categories
If you don't mind me asking, why are you removing the UNSC Category from pages such as UNSC Calcutta? I can see with some of the edits, where you change the category, but wouldn't it be better to add the new categories, seeing as they fall into both? --DKong Talk Cont 13:39, 12 December 2010 (EST)
- Because it's counter productive in terms of organisation; half of the articles are either Covenant or UNSC origin, so why add such useless category?- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 13:45, 12 December 2010 (EST)
- What Subtank said.--The All-knowing Sith'ari 14:54, 12 December 2010 (EST)