11,048
edits
Talk:Hydrostatic gel: Difference between revisions
m
moved Talk:Hydrostatic Gel to Talk:Hydrostatic gel
m (moved Talk:Hydrostatic Gel to Talk:Hydrostatic gel) |
|||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::What? Doesn't the armor count as clothing? It's like saying, "Underneath those clothes... nude." --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="000000">Dragon<font color="FF0000">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="000000">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 07:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | ::What? Doesn't the armor count as clothing? It's like saying, "Underneath those clothes... nude." --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="000000">Dragon<font color="FF0000">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="000000">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 07:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
I was just saying becouse it makes direct contact so you must be | I was just saying becouse it makes direct contact so you must be naked in the armor,i mean it dosent say direct contact with clothes.--[[User:Mac10&Cheese|Mac10&Cheese]] 21:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
On page 114 of The Fall of Reach Dr. Halsey says "... Against the skin of the operator, there is a moisture-absorbing cloth suit...", so the hydrostatic gel layer is somewhere inside the armor, but it's not the innermost layer. | |||
Thats true,but then that conflicts with the page. revise it. | |||