12,820
edits
Forum:Amending the Canon Policy: Difference between revisions
Forum:Amending the Canon Policy (view source)
Revision as of 15:05, November 13, 2010
, 14 years ago→Comments
Dragonclaws (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
:::You've done a great job, Subtank! I'm glad that your proposition isn't a case of "''Bungie first, all else is irrelevant''", like so many so-called "fans" favor. With this policy, the heart of the series is the heart of canon, while everything else is respected, just as it should be. In fact, this policy isn't a major change from the current one, the only exception being that Bungie no longer has the indomitable, end-all-be-all say on canon. Many thumbs up! --[[User talk:Braidenvl|"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." -Thomas Jefferson]] 14:17, 13 November 2010 (EST) | :::You've done a great job, Subtank! I'm glad that your proposition isn't a case of "''Bungie first, all else is irrelevant''", like so many so-called "fans" favor. With this policy, the heart of the series is the heart of canon, while everything else is respected, just as it should be. In fact, this policy isn't a major change from the current one, the only exception being that Bungie no longer has the indomitable, end-all-be-all say on canon. Many thumbs up! --[[User talk:Braidenvl|"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have." -Thomas Jefferson]] 14:17, 13 November 2010 (EST) | ||
Looks good. There's just a little discrepancy where "fanon-canon" is listed also as "Halopedia-canon". If you're going for the former on either Halopedia or Halo Fanon, I'll suggest using simply "fanon", as that's a portmanteau of "fanfiction" and "canon" already. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#800080">Dragon<font color="#3B3F42">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#DE397E">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 15:05, 13 November 2010 (EST) | |||