Talk:Helmet Upgrades: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
m (→Deletion) |
Alex T Snow (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::::There, other than overall cleanup, and pictures of each and a few for the Gallery, and some more Trivia, it's finished. [[User talk:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:59, 20 October 2010 (EDT) | ::::There, other than overall cleanup, and pictures of each and a few for the Gallery, and some more Trivia, it's finished. [[User talk:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 16:59, 20 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
:::::Never have I said these attachments were not canon or ''less canon''. These information can be added to their respected articles, which would be the Helmet articles. For example, the attachments of the Mark V(B) could be added to the [[Mark_V(B)_MJOLNIR_Powered_Assault_Armor#Helmet_Characteristics|Helmet Characteristics section]] of the Mark V(B) article. I don't see why we need to separate them if they're basically part of the armour. It's better because it's more concise.- <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 17:01, 20 October 2010 (EDT) | :::::Never have I said these attachments were not canon or ''less canon''. These information can be added to their respected articles, which would be the Helmet articles. For example, the attachments of the Mark V(B) could be added to the [[Mark_V(B)_MJOLNIR_Powered_Assault_Armor#Helmet_Characteristics|Helmet Characteristics section]] of the Mark V(B) article. I don't see why we need to separate them if they're basically part of the armour. It's better because it's more concise.- <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 17:01, 20 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
::::::Okay, I wasn't serious about the non-canon comment, but the problem is the huge amount of errors in the armory's names and descriptions. The CNM that looks like PEQ-2 and the one that looks like a webcam have BOTH been called CNM and CNM-I, the EVA [C] Helmet has a HUL attachment that's named HUL[3], but is a standard HUL, the Air Assault helmet's third upgrade is called FC-I which is CNM-I and HUL, but the actual ones on the helmet are a CNM-I and UA. There's quite a lot more, and I feel people will have pointless arguments over what's correct if they're all split up like that. It's good to have a parent page, like the parent MJOLNIR page. Sure we could not have it and have all the MJOLNIR information on each Mark's page, but there's some info that if really best served on a parent page. Sure there's not a whole lot right now, but let people edit and add, for example, I didn't know what CBRN meant before, or how to say it. My point is, with all the errors and mistakes we would have horribly mismatched article with regardes to the uprgrades. [[User talk:Alex T Snow|Alex T Snow]] 17:12, 20 October 2010 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:12, October 20, 2010
Deletion
Simply unneeded.- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 16:14, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
- Really Subtank? Can you let me finish first at least? Alex T Snow 16:44, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
- I can already foresee the final version of this article. I have the power of foresight! This article will list all the helmet upgrades in Halo: Reach and all the requirements needed to unlock it. If this is the case, then this article is redundant. If not, I would love to see the final version.- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 16:51, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
- We have articles for the rest of the upgrades, it's not like I made individual articles for them, that would be unneeded. With the amount of inconsistencies and errors in the armory discriptions it needs somewhere that clears it up. Are you saying that helmet attachments are somehow less canon? I've never made a page before so if it needs improving, renaming, or just combining this info into an existing acticle if it fits there better that would be fine. Oh, and I didn't even think to add the requirements and Cr, I was writing this from a canon and in-universe persepective, not a game one. Alex T Snow 16:56, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
- There, other than overall cleanup, and pictures of each and a few for the Gallery, and some more Trivia, it's finished. Alex T Snow 16:59, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
- Never have I said these attachments were not canon or less canon. These information can be added to their respected articles, which would be the Helmet articles. For example, the attachments of the Mark V(B) could be added to the Helmet Characteristics section of the Mark V(B) article. I don't see why we need to separate them if they're basically part of the armour. It's better because it's more concise.- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 17:01, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
- Okay, I wasn't serious about the non-canon comment, but the problem is the huge amount of errors in the armory's names and descriptions. The CNM that looks like PEQ-2 and the one that looks like a webcam have BOTH been called CNM and CNM-I, the EVA [C] Helmet has a HUL attachment that's named HUL[3], but is a standard HUL, the Air Assault helmet's third upgrade is called FC-I which is CNM-I and HUL, but the actual ones on the helmet are a CNM-I and UA. There's quite a lot more, and I feel people will have pointless arguments over what's correct if they're all split up like that. It's good to have a parent page, like the parent MJOLNIR page. Sure we could not have it and have all the MJOLNIR information on each Mark's page, but there's some info that if really best served on a parent page. Sure there's not a whole lot right now, but let people edit and add, for example, I didn't know what CBRN meant before, or how to say it. My point is, with all the errors and mistakes we would have horribly mismatched article with regardes to the uprgrades. Alex T Snow 17:12, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
- Never have I said these attachments were not canon or less canon. These information can be added to their respected articles, which would be the Helmet articles. For example, the attachments of the Mark V(B) could be added to the Helmet Characteristics section of the Mark V(B) article. I don't see why we need to separate them if they're basically part of the armour. It's better because it's more concise.- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 17:01, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
- There, other than overall cleanup, and pictures of each and a few for the Gallery, and some more Trivia, it's finished. Alex T Snow 16:59, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
- We have articles for the rest of the upgrades, it's not like I made individual articles for them, that would be unneeded. With the amount of inconsistencies and errors in the armory discriptions it needs somewhere that clears it up. Are you saying that helmet attachments are somehow less canon? I've never made a page before so if it needs improving, renaming, or just combining this info into an existing acticle if it fits there better that would be fine. Oh, and I didn't even think to add the requirements and Cr, I was writing this from a canon and in-universe persepective, not a game one. Alex T Snow 16:56, 20 October 2010 (EDT)
- I can already foresee the final version of this article. I have the power of foresight! This article will list all the helmet upgrades in Halo: Reach and all the requirements needed to unlock it. If this is the case, then this article is redundant. If not, I would love to see the final version.- 5əb'7aŋk(7alk) 16:51, 20 October 2010 (EDT)