Talk:Battle of the Citadel: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:43, August 24, 2009

Deletion

Support The engagement was just one of several skirmishes that made up the overall battle. This engagement was never explicitly named, as small scale fights within larger battles are rarely given that distinction. --E D File:ArmyROTC.gif 22:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Alright then, if that's true, why do we still have Battle of Voi, Battle of the Silent Cartographer, Second Battle of High Charity, etc. File:CT's Battle Flag - Distressed.JPG Anthony I of the United States^Talk 2/25/2008

Deletion is a bit much, I think it would be better to merge them. Halo-343 12:33, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Oppose Per CT; Raid on the Truth and Reconciliation was never explicitly named, but has survived deletion since late October. And any notability claim is rather false; both the Raid and the Citadel battle are quite notable, with each of them concerning major objects in the Haloverse. The Raid on the TaR involved the capture of a major Covenant ship, and the Battle of the Citadel led to Truth's death and thus the disbanding of the Covenant. Çya, M ø u s e 00:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Oppose We should keep them. If we redirect them to larger articles, it's just gonna get downsized. I don't want to read the Battle of the Citadel "In a Nutshell," with all of the information about it being... "with an attack on the Citadel finaly ending the war." hm... It seems someone had deleted the "Truth and Reconciliation" and the "Assault on the Control Room" battle articles. No information saying why. All I'm getting on IRC is KillerCRS saying that they arn't battles and should be removed. Coincidentaly, both didn't have "Battle of" in their names either.Forerunner 15:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Oppose - As per Forerunner. - JEA13 ^[iTalk] 13:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Oppose I guess it's notable enough. The thing i care about is, it's treated like a part of the Battle of the Ark like it should be, not separate from it. As opposed to the Battle of the Flood-controlled Shield World and Battle of the Apex debate. --Jugus 14:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:24, August 24, 2009 (edit) JEA13 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 09:43, August 24, 2009 (edit) (undo) Tacitus (talk \| contribs) (→‎Deletion) Newer edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:

	{{oppose}} - As per Forerunner. - [[User:JEA13\|<font color="orange">'''JEA13'''</font>]] <sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:JEA13\|<font color="orange">iTalk</font>]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 13:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)		{{oppose}} - As per Forerunner. - [[User:JEA13\|<font color="orange">'''JEA13'''</font>]] <sup><nowiki>[</nowiki>[[User talk:JEA13\|<font color="orange">iTalk</font>]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></sup> 13:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

			{{Oppose}} I guess it's notable enough. The thing i care about is, it's treated like a '''part''' of the [[Battle of the Ark]] like it should be, not separate from it. As opposed to the [[Battle of the Flood-controlled Shield World]] and [[Battle of the Apex]] debate. --[[User talk:Jugus\|Jugus]] 14:43, 24 August 2009 (UTC)