Talk:Installation 07: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:43, August 22, 2009

There is no evidence shown to clarify the actual terrain of Installation 07. Covenant Ghost 15:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

You mean other than what appears in Halo 3? --E D File:ArmyROTC.gif 19:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

If someone where to show me where in halo 3 this information came from, then it might believe it. However, looking at it in the ark cutscene and denoting it having a certain terrain based on its color is somewhat illogical. Covenant Ghost 21:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

The source is right there on the page. See it for yourself. --E D File:ArmyROTC.gif 21:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Thats not Installation 07, thats my Installation 01 picture. I swear thats 01. Kap2310 17:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Size

Where are we getting this idea that the rings are all different sizes? It says that this ring is smaller - where is this coming from? Diaboy 09:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Most likely from the scene in Halo 2 when 343 Guilty Spark explained that all of the remaning Halos where put on standby. The becon had a holographic display of the instellations, and they each had varrying sizes. 24.144.151.36 05:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

i still think ascendant justice has all there descriptions and pictures of the halo rings backwards because we only know of 2 rings having earth like envrinoments, 04 and 05, and yet the show only 04 and 03 having them...SPARTANF-259 18:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Monitor

Where's the evidence that the Monitor "117649 Submissive Abhorrent" exists?

—əґ ыţ єґ ιιб

Number System

Is it true that it would be called 07? In Iris, AdjutantReflex had a countdown in base seven. If the Forerunner number system was in base seven, this would be Installation 10. Is there alternate evidence the Forerunners used base ten? --Dragonclaws^(talk) 23:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Um, Wha...What?--Unreal Admin 23:52, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Base seven - 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 11 12 13 14 15 16... and so on. That is what he's referring to. He is asking if Installation 07 would be Installation 10, citing the fact that AdjutantReflex had a countdown in base seven, rather than base ten.

Smoke

00:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

That would more likely make the installation's 'name' 010 - the leading 0 used to indicate a non-base10 number. -StarLion 13:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Additional thought: There -IS- evidence the forerunners used base 10 - '343 Guilty Spark'. If using Base-7, the operator of Installation 03 should have been 0100 Guilty Spark (and every monitor would have been a 1 followed by x-1 0's, so 01 010 0100 01000 etc). -StarLion 13:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:36, August 22, 2009 (edit) halowikia>StarLion (→‎Number System) ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:43, August 22, 2009 (edit) (undo) halowikia>StarLion (→‎Number System) Newer edit →
Line 29:		Line 29:

	::That would more likely make the installation's 'name' 010 - the leading 0 used to indicate a non-base10 number. -[[User talk:StarLion\|StarLion]] 13:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)		::That would more likely make the installation's 'name' 010 - the leading 0 used to indicate a non-base10 number. -[[User talk:StarLion\|StarLion]] 13:36, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
			::Additional thought: There -IS- evidence the forerunners used base 10 - '343 Guilty Spark'. If using Base-7, the operator of Installation 03 should have been 0100 Guilty Spark (and every monitor would have been a 1 followed by x-1 0's, so 01 010 0100 01000 etc). -[[User talk:StarLion\|StarLion]] 13:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC)