Talk:Ur-Didact: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Does anyone know what his final words were? [[User talk:Drsdino|Drsdino]] 20:05, September 20, 2009 (UTC) | Does anyone know what his final words were? [[User talk:Drsdino|Drsdino]] 20:05, September 20, 2009 (UTC) | ||
I concur that Didact did not die in the firing of the Arrays, but was on the Ark at the time. | I concur that Didact did not die in the firing of the Arrays, but was on the Ark at the time. [[Special:Contributions/74.94.66.171|74.94.66.171]] 20:02, December 8, 2009 (UTC)demandread | ||
<ul><li>The Librarian destroys her keyships after she discovers that the Gravemind is planning an assault. The reason for destroying the keyships is clearly to keep Gravemind from the Ark, and she tells Didact that "it's coming for you". | <ul><li>The Librarian destroys her keyships after she discovers that the Gravemind is planning an assault. The reason for destroying the keyships is clearly to keep Gravemind from the Ark, and she tells Didact that "it's coming for you". | ||
<li>The Librarian seems to understand that she will perish along with the Gravemind, but gives no indication that Didact will die. She says "And now you can destroy it. But you cannot save me." | <li>The Librarian seems to understand that she will perish along with the Gravemind, but gives no indication that Didact will die. She says "And now you can destroy it. But you cannot save me." | ||
<li>Similarly, Didact bemoans that he is forced to kill the Librarian, but makes no reference to his own death. "My inaction and foolishness kept me here ...[and] makes me your executioner". | <li>Similarly, Didact bemoans that he is forced to kill the Librarian, but makes no reference to his own death. "My inaction and foolishness kept me here ...[and] makes me your executioner". | ||
<li>Didact also indicates that he will go on the Great Journey (presumably, restoring the native species from the Ark back to their homeworlds and then leaving the galaxy) on his own, after the firing of the Array. Not only does this mean he would have to survive the activation of the Halos, but strongly suggests that he was on the Ark throughout the conversations with the Librarian. "I will burn this stinking menace in your name. And then? I will begin our Great Journey without you".</ul> | <li>Didact also indicates that he will go on the Great Journey (presumably, restoring the native species from the Ark back to their homeworlds and then leaving the galaxy) on his own, after the firing of the Array. Not only does this mean he would have to survive the activation of the Halos, but strongly suggests that he was on the Ark throughout the conversations with the Librarian. "I will burn this stinking menace in your name. And then? I will begin our Great Journey without you".</ul> |
Revision as of 15:02, December 8, 2009
WTF! I read that he was the father, not lover! -- The State(Our Decrees and Law)(The State Alchemists we've enlisted)File:ROY!.jpg 16:58, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- In regard to the possibility of a filial relationship: If the Librarian is indeed filial to the Didact, they never speak as anything but equals. I think people are confused by the message displayed upon initial access to Terminal Seven: when a son writes his father and tells him of his courage. It would seem to be nothing more than a random message that found its way into the Terminal. There were already so many errors and anomalies in all the Terminals' memories that an aberrant message is not surprising. Kori126 19:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
In terminal 6 (I think) it say that he had a son and that the son had decided to go and fight the Flood and what's with the thing about him being an AI he got to be a person as he created 'Offensive Bias' and Offensive Bias defeated Mendicant Bias --MCDBBlits 20:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Should here be the question from first Halo, from Two Betroyals. That when Guilty Spark asks Chief: "Last time you asked me, would I do it?" Or something like that. If Didact activated rings from Halo 4, he would have asked that question.
Wait, something or whatnot said something that like John-117 was a descendent of this Forerunner? That's pretty cool, but is there a more precise reference, or does one simply have to scan through the Terminals?
I do not think that didact activated the Halo array from Installation 04. Here's why:
- In the terminals Didact urges the librarian to come back behind the line (aka. Maginot sphere)which we can assume at the center was the Ark.(I can cite the terminals if need be)
- In the array data recorder file from IRIS, one of the lines reads "Confrm: Array sync …1…2…3…4…5…6…7…{check}" which implies that it was fired from installation 00*If Didact had been at installation 04 it was likely he would have been captured (provided that it was outside the sphere)
Thoughts? comments? suggestions? Motarius 17:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- -The Didact obviously activated Installations 01-07 from somewhere, but yes it need not have been from Installation 04. But the Ark is outside the galaxy, whilst the Forerunners inhabited worlds inside the galaxy. They needed Keyships and Portals to access the Ark, did they not? The Librarian said "I've remotely destroyed our Keyships. A security measure. Without them I cannot reach the Ark. But neither then can the thing.". It seemed inside the Maginot sphere was a collection of the worlds most important to the Forerunners. There might have been (and probably was) a Portal inside the Maginot sphere for travel to the Ark, if that is what you mean by "at the centre was the Ark". But I do not think the Ark itself was at the centre of Maginot sphere.
- -How does a simple confirmation of Array synchronicity imply that the Installations were activated from 00? It simply means they were synchronised...
- -I thought fauna died no matter where they were in the galaxy, even if they were on a Ring.
- -Hes must have activated the Halo array from one of the rings. The Ark is outside of their effective firing range, therefore it probably wouldn't have killed him if he activated it from the Ark. --Hotdamnitsaaron 02:00, October 26, 2009 (UTC)
- -The Didact speaks of dying (so it seems to me) in his last letter to the Librarian. I think he expected to die. Kori126 19:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
On the Forerunner page the trivia section says that Didact survived, can someone confirm this for me plz User:Captain-One
- I looked and did not see that, but how could the Didact have survived the activation of Installations 01-07? Offensive Bias was the only one left to interpret the messages and records and data. Kori126 19:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone know what his final words were? Drsdino 20:05, September 20, 2009 (UTC)
I concur that Didact did not die in the firing of the Arrays, but was on the Ark at the time. 74.94.66.171 20:02, December 8, 2009 (UTC)demandread
- The Librarian destroys her keyships after she discovers that the Gravemind is planning an assault. The reason for destroying the keyships is clearly to keep Gravemind from the Ark, and she tells Didact that "it's coming for you".
- The Librarian seems to understand that she will perish along with the Gravemind, but gives no indication that Didact will die. She says "And now you can destroy it. But you cannot save me."
- Similarly, Didact bemoans that he is forced to kill the Librarian, but makes no reference to his own death. "My inaction and foolishness kept me here ...[and] makes me your executioner".
- Didact also indicates that he will go on the Great Journey (presumably, restoring the native species from the Ark back to their homeworlds and then leaving the galaxy) on his own, after the firing of the Array. Not only does this mean he would have to survive the activation of the Halos, but strongly suggests that he was on the Ark throughout the conversations with the Librarian. "I will burn this stinking menace in your name. And then? I will begin our Great Journey without you".