149
edits
Talk:Covenant destroyer: Difference between revisions
→paragraph in the middle
| Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
:::::It is sufficient to establish a common pattern in the Covenant design. A ratio of 2:1 that is.<b>[[User:-Ascension-|<font color="#5D8AA8">外<font color="#9BDDFF">国</font>人</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:-Ascension-|<font color="#5D8AA8">7alk</font>]])</sup></b> 00:14, February 14, 2010 (UTC) | :::::It is sufficient to establish a common pattern in the Covenant design. A ratio of 2:1 that is.<b>[[User:-Ascension-|<font color="#5D8AA8">外<font color="#9BDDFF">国</font>人</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:-Ascension-|<font color="#5D8AA8">7alk</font>]])</sup></b> 00:14, February 14, 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::::its still excessively generalised for two ship models. it would be better to say something along the lines of "like the CCS-class Battlecruiser and the Assault Carrier, it has three sections." [[User talk:Asdf1239|Asdf1239]] 00:35, February 14, 2010 (UTC) | ::::::its still excessively generalised for two ship models. it would be better to say something along the lines of "like the CCS-class Battlecruiser and the Assault Carrier, it has three sections." [[User talk:Asdf1239|Asdf1239]] 00:35, February 14, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::::wait - does the destroyer even have three sections? theres the fuselage, two wings slanting down, and two wings pointing sideways. those arent clearly defined bulbous "sections" like in the ccs, the only way that it can have three sections is if you regard each ''pair'' of wings as a section, which is awkward compared to how the other ships are described. [[User talk:Asdf1239|Asdf1239]] 00:40, February 14, 2010 (UTC) | |||