Talk:105th Drop Jet Platoon: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This group could very well be a reference to a platoon of ODSTs from the 105th Division. On page 65 of TFOR it's stated that among the Helljumpers traditional tattoos is: "Drop Jet Jumpers". It is possible that the Spartans were just refering to the platoon as a part of the overall 105th ODST division as opposed to a specific "105th Platoon" especially since if the same military logic of current times can be applied, platoons are numbered as a component of a company, and a company is not large enough to have at least 105 platoons of approximately 50 marines. -- [[User talk:CINCUNSCDF|CINCUNSCDF]] 04:35, 16 January 2007
This group could very well be a reference to a platoon of ODSTs from the 105th Division. On page 65 of TFOR it's stated that among the Helljumpers traditional tattoos is: "Drop Jet Jumpers". It is possible that the Spartans were just refering to the platoon as a part of the overall 105th ODST division as opposed to a specific "105th Platoon" especially since if the same military logic of current times can be applied, platoons are numbered as a component of a company, and a company is not large enough to have at least 105 platoons of approximately 50 marines. -- [[User talk:CINCUNSCDF|CINCUNSCDF]] 04:35, 16 January 2007
:Yes this makes sense, but how the unit's name was written cannot be ignored. It was called the "105th Drop Jet Platoon," and though I agree that Platoons never get their own numberings, the book made it clear this this one did. If it had said "The 105th''''s''' drop jet platoon" then this logic would be applicable. Until then, we can't contradict what the books say for the sake of current reasoning. --<b>[[User:ED|<font color="000000">ED</font>]]<sub>([[User talk:ED|<font color="000000">talk</font>]])</sub><sup>[http://halofanon.wikia.com/wiki/Halo:_Shock_Front<font color="000000">(shockfront)]</font></sup></b> 16:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
:Yes this makes sense, but how the unit's name was written cannot be ignored. It was called the "105th Drop Jet Platoon," and though I agree that Platoons never get their own numberings, the book made it clear this this one did. If it had said "The 105th''''s''' drop jet platoon" then this logic would be applicable. Until then, we can't contradict what the books say for the sake of current reasoning. --<b>[[User:ED|<font color="000000">ED</font>]]<sub>([[User talk:ED|<font color="000000">talk</font>]])</sub><sup>[http://halofanon.wikia.com/wiki/Halo:_Shock_Front<font color="000000">(shockfront)]</font></sup></b> 16:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
I think it is important to point out that the way the book was written it could also be refering to a specific troop type in the 105th and not giving them their own numbering at all, but refering specificly to 105th Division's Drop Jet platoon. I dont think that a platoon would have been givin the same numbering as a famous division of ODSTs. For this reason I have to agree that it is more likely refering to a platoon of ODSTs from the 105th Division. I dont ignore your point though that it is written in a way that would tell you they have their own numbering, but it is importent to remenber that a person was refering to them in this way. Now if it was a third person expination of the 105th Drop Jet Platoon I would agree that they have their own numbering, but it is a name that somone else is calling them and that is important to remember.-- ECHO 96 -- 13 December 2007
I think it is important to point out that the way the book was written it could also be referring to a specific troop type in the 105th and not giving them their own numbering at all, but referring specificly to the 105th Division's Drop Jet platoon. I dont think that a platoon would have been givin the same numbering as a famous division of ODSTs. For this reason I have to agree that it is more likely referring to a platoon of ODSTs from the 105th Division. I dont ignore your point though that it is written in a way that would tell you they have their own numbering, but it is importent to remenber that a person was refering to them in this way. Now if it was a third person expination of the 105th Drop Jet Platoon I would agree that they have their own numbering, but it is a name that someone else is calling them and that is important to remember.-- ECHO 96 -- 13 December 2007

Revision as of 20:20, December 13, 2007

This group could very well be a reference to a platoon of ODSTs from the 105th Division. On page 65 of TFOR it's stated that among the Helljumpers traditional tattoos is: "Drop Jet Jumpers". It is possible that the Spartans were just refering to the platoon as a part of the overall 105th ODST division as opposed to a specific "105th Platoon" especially since if the same military logic of current times can be applied, platoons are numbered as a component of a company, and a company is not large enough to have at least 105 platoons of approximately 50 marines. -- CINCUNSCDF 04:35, 16 January 2007

Yes this makes sense, but how the unit's name was written cannot be ignored. It was called the "105th Drop Jet Platoon," and though I agree that Platoons never get their own numberings, the book made it clear this this one did. If it had said "The 105th's drop jet platoon" then this logic would be applicable. Until then, we can't contradict what the books say for the sake of current reasoning. --ED(talk)(shockfront) 16:01, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I think it is important to point out that the way the book was written it could also be referring to a specific troop type in the 105th and not giving them their own numbering at all, but referring specificly to the 105th Division's Drop Jet platoon. I dont think that a platoon would have been givin the same numbering as a famous division of ODSTs. For this reason I have to agree that it is more likely referring to a platoon of ODSTs from the 105th Division. I dont ignore your point though that it is written in a way that would tell you they have their own numbering, but it is importent to remenber that a person was refering to them in this way. Now if it was a third person expination of the 105th Drop Jet Platoon I would agree that they have their own numbering, but it is a name that someone else is calling them and that is important to remember.-- ECHO 96 -- 13 December 2007