Talk:Covenant Bomb

• What's disputed about the article?

• If RR has refused to say what is disputed, I beleive that there is no reason for this article be left as being dipsuted, until RR says what he is disputing --Dockman 17:49, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

• Technically, he is disputing the name, saying that he has never heard it called an "Anti-Matter Bomb".--Rot^Brandon 06:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

• • Well what else are we gonna call it. Covenant Bomb is cr*p. We can hardly call in the Matter Bomb, That sounds like the target expands, crazy. Template:UserForerunner 19:55 17/2/07

Its too scientisfic, I only heard it once in Dan Brown's Angels and demons

• There is no evidence that it is an anti-matter device, in fact an anti-matter bomb of that size would be more than sufficient to destroy a planet and would be a waste to use on a space station. Also if the Athens and Malta were destroyed by an anti-matter device of that size it would have vaporized the entire battle group. A very small amount of anti-matter can release an extremely large amount of energy, and those bombs were quite large.

Raptor117 17:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

• Raptor is right, You do not need that much Anti-Matter just take out a space station. However We cannot say it's disputed, Bungie is the one that made it that big. --File:Wraith.png WRAITH ^COMM _CONTRIBS 18:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Yes, we can say it's disputed--no one ever says that this bomb uses anti-matter. --GPT_(talk)^(eating) 04:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)