Talk:Paegaas Workshop Spiker: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
::Note that when I posted that comment, the article was in a different state. The image I was refering to was a poor magazine scan. I now believe the images are okay. --[[User:Dragonclaws|Dragonclaws]] 22:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
::Note that when I posted that comment, the article was in a different state. The image I was refering to was a poor magazine scan. I now believe the images are okay. --[[User:Dragonclaws|Dragonclaws]] 22:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


: I dont tink theres much need 4 that video, i have a better 1 [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG-M7b-ZIC8&eurl= here]
: I dont tink theres much need 4 that video, i have a better 1 [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tG-M7b-ZIC8&eurl= here] {{unsigned|Forerunner}}
 
::It says there that it's for a modded map. That means it's not canon, isn't official, and shouldn't be used here. I know your intention is good, but I just don't think that's a good example. However, the video link ''does'' need updating, because that video is no longer there. '''[[User:Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="red">g<sup>u</sup>e<sub>s</sub>t<sup>y</sup></font>]]-[[User talk:Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="blue">p<sub>e</sub>r<sup>s</sup>o<sub>n</sub>y</font>]]-[[Special:Contributions/Guesty-Persony-Thingy|<font color="green"><sup>t</sup>h<sub>i</sub>n<sup>g</sup>y</font>]]''' 21:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:55, January 9, 2007

I see no reason to keep the biggger image when we already have an up-close shot of the gun. It seems to me that all guns are dual-wielded the same. BTW, sorry for the typos in my earlier summary. --Dragonclaws 04:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

I think, that if it's going to be one shot or the other, that the one of the Spartan dual-weilding should be kept, as the spikers are much more visible in it. —This unsigned comment was made by Dockman (talkcontribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
Note that when I posted that comment, the article was in a different state. The image I was refering to was a poor magazine scan. I now believe the images are okay. --Dragonclaws 22:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
I dont tink theres much need 4 that video, i have a better 1 here —This unsigned comment was made by Forerunner (talkcontribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~
It says there that it's for a modded map. That means it's not canon, isn't official, and shouldn't be used here. I know your intention is good, but I just don't think that's a good example. However, the video link does need updating, because that video is no longer there. guesty-persony-thingy 21:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)