Seeker of Truth: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
m (Fixing Grammatical Errors) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Ratings}} | {{Ratings}} | ||
{{era|FOR}} | {{era|FOR}} | ||
The '''Seeker of Truth''' was the | The '''Seeker of Truth''' was the Flagship of the [[Covenant]] [[Fleet of Particular Justice]]. Interestingly, it was originally the ''[[Ascendant Justice]]'' that led the Fleet. It is possible that the ''Ascendant Justice'' was used as a secondary Flagship once the ''Seeker of Truth'' was destroyed by the ''Pillar of Autumn''. This makes it possible that one or more of the Flagships was a secondary vessel to the [[Arbiter (character)|Supreme Commander]]. Then, the [[Supreme Commander]] of the Fleet commandeered the mysterious flagship during the campaign at [[Reach]] and later, [[Installation 04]]. The future [[Arbiter]] would later use it to return back to [[High Charity]] after Installation 04 was destroyed. | ||
==Known Crew== | ==Known Crew== |
Revision as of 12:36, June 11, 2008
The Seeker of Truth was the Flagship of the Covenant Fleet of Particular Justice. Interestingly, it was originally the Ascendant Justice that led the Fleet. It is possible that the Ascendant Justice was used as a secondary Flagship once the Seeker of Truth was destroyed by the Pillar of Autumn. This makes it possible that one or more of the Flagships was a secondary vessel to the Supreme Commander. Then, the Supreme Commander of the Fleet commandeered the mysterious flagship during the campaign at Reach and later, Installation 04. The future Arbiter would later use it to return back to High Charity after Installation 04 was destroyed.
Known Crew
- Supreme Commander of the Fleet of Paticular Justice
- SpecOps Commander Rtas 'Vadumee
- SpecOps Sub-Commander 'Kusovai
Trivia
- In the I Love Bees Halo 2 endorsement saga, there was a Covenant AI entitled the Seeker, who had a credo: "Seek the truth, behold the truth, reveal the truth. That is the law, and the whole of the law." Any significance of this quote is up to an individual's analysis.