Talk:Class-2 medium plasma mortar: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "([A-Za-z]+) Policy" to "$1 policy"
m (→‎Merge: clean up, replaced: Type-47 Ultra Heavy Assault Platform → Type-47 Scarab (2))
m (Text replacement - "([A-Za-z]+) Policy" to "$1 policy")
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Merge==
==Merge==
Even if {{Username|General5 7}} gave you permission to recreate the article, this page needs to be merged with the [[plasma mortar]] article for two reasons: It has been confirmed to be a type of plasma mortar, but then someof you might say, "This subject is notable enough to warrant its own article.", however I might reply saying that because its name is unconfirmed and is called "plasma mortar" by Bungie, it should stay in the "plasma mortar" article until it gets an official name. --{{User:Cally99117/Sig}}
Even if General5 7 gave you permission to recreate the article, this page needs to be merged with the plasma mortar article for two reasons: It has been confirmed to be a type of plasma mortar, but then someof you might say, "This subject is notable enough to warrant its own article.", however I might reply saying that because its name is unconfirmed and is called "plasma mortar" by Bungie, it should stay in the "plasma mortar" article until it gets an official name. --{{User:Cally99117/Sig}}
:I agree. It is definately subject to its own article, as it functions entirely different from a traditional Wraith Plasma Mortar. However, we don't know its official name, or even its common name. Nor do we even know the official name for the Revenant. Bungie seems a little lax in their canon reveals and focuses more on gameplay reveals in these last few months before release. So, I believe we'll get some of what we're looking for in the game manual. Anywho, even though it hasn't been named yet, that doesn't stop us from creating an article for it. It is a different weapon and deserves a different article. A more appropriate name would be "[Unspecified/Unknown/Unnamed] Plasma Mortar".--File:PENGUIN4.gif|15px]]''[[User:FluffyEmoPenguin|<span style="color:black; font-family:Verdana">Fluffy</span><span style="color:gray; font-family:Verdana">Emo</span><span style="color:black; font-family:Verdana">Penguin</span>]]<sup><small>([[User talk:FluffyEmoPenguin|<span style="color:gray">ice quack!</span>]])</small></sup>'' 19:37, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
:I agree. It is definately subject to its own article, as it functions entirely different from a traditional Wraith Plasma Mortar. However, we don't know its official name, or even its common name. Nor do we even know the official name for the Revenant. Bungie seems a little lax in their canon reveals and focuses more on gameplay reveals in these last few months before release. So, I believe we'll get some of what we're looking for in the game manual. Anywho, even though it hasn't been named yet, that doesn't stop us from creating an article for it. It is a different weapon and deserves a different article. A more appropriate name would be "[Unspecified/Unknown/Unnamed] Plasma Mortar".--''[[User:FluffyEmoPenguin|<span style="color:black; font-family:Verdana">Fluffy</span><span style="color:gray; font-family:Verdana">Emo</span><span style="color:black; font-family:Verdana">Penguin</span>]]<sup><small>([[User talk:FluffyEmoPenguin|<span style="color:gray">ice quack!</span>]])</small></sup>'' 19:37, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
::It is a ''type'' of plasma mortar, but it isn't ''the'' plasma mortar. I do feel that it's significant enough to warrant its own article. I added the ArticleName template to show that, while we don't yet know its official name, apart from the catch-all "plasma mortar" term, it is a separate weapon. My point is this: it's going to have its own article some day, so it might as well have one now. --[[User talk:Braidenvl|&quot;Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have.&quot; -Thomas Jefferson]] 19:46, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
::It is a ''type'' of plasma mortar, but it isn't ''the'' plasma mortar. I do feel that it's significant enough to warrant its own article. I added the ArticleName template to show that, while we don't yet know its official name, apart from the catch-all "plasma mortar" term, it is a separate weapon. My point is this: it's going to have its own article some day, so it might as well have one now. --[[User talk:Braidenvl|&quot;Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have.&quot; -Thomas Jefferson]] 19:46, August 13, 2010 (UTC)
:::You don't get it do you? In the Bungie Weekly Update it ''is'' referred to as "plasma mortar" thus isn't a different weapon and should be merged. --{{User:Cally99117/Sig}}
:::You don't get it do you? In the Bungie Weekly Update it ''is'' referred to as "plasma mortar" thus isn't a different weapon and should be merged. --{{User:Cally99117/Sig}}
{{Quote|It’s not nearly as powerful as the Wraith’s cannon, and the arc is less pronounced, but the rate of fire is cranked up a few ticks...|Bungie}}
{{Quote|It’s not nearly as powerful as the Wraith’s cannon, and the arc is less pronounced, but the rate of fire is cranked up a few ticks...|Bungie}}
::::I thought I should just point out this quote. This proves that it ''is'' a completely different from the Wraith's mortar. {{User:General5 7/sig}}
::::I thought I should just point out this quote. This proves that it ''is'' a completely different from the Wraith's mortar. {{User:General5 7/sig}}
:::::I think we should make the Super Scarab an article because its power is a lot more different than the normal [[Type-47 Scarab|Scarab]] in which you said that this weapons power is also a lot different as you said above. If you read the update you will see that Bungie calls it "plasma mortar" and the weapon is not 100% different from the plasma mortar. --{{User:Cally99117/Sig}}
:::::I think we should make the Super Scarab an article because its power is a lot more different than the normal Scarab in which you said that this weapons power is also a lot different as you said above. If you read the update you will see that Bungie calls it "plasma mortar" and the weapon is not 100% different from the plasma mortar. --{{User:Cally99117/Sig}}
::::::Not only is its power different, but the way its projectiles behave is ''entirely'' different. Also, I noticed the new Phantoms and Spirits have this same projectile for their cannons so this isn't a single case scenario where one vehicle gets a special treatment with its own scaled-down weapon variant.--{{User:FluffyEmoPenguin/sig}}
::::::Not only is its power different, but the way its projectiles behave is ''entirely'' different. Also, I noticed the new Phantoms and Spirits have this same projectile for their cannons so this isn't a single case scenario where one vehicle gets a special treatment with its own scaled-down weapon variant.--{{User:FluffyEmoPenguin/sig}}


Line 29: Line 29:
:I think The Unbalanced Warior won me over. No merge. They are different enough and this one is a variant of the normal mortor, much like the M6s and MA5s. Also, a technical name will probably never be given as we don't even know the tecnical name for the Wraith's plasma mortar so the name may as well stay with a "ArticleName" template. [[User:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:purple">'''Que'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:red">'''Sera'''</span>]], [[User talk:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:orange">'''Sera'''</span>]] 19:25, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
:I think The Unbalanced Warior won me over. No merge. They are different enough and this one is a variant of the normal mortor, much like the M6s and MA5s. Also, a technical name will probably never be given as we don't even know the tecnical name for the Wraith's plasma mortar so the name may as well stay with a "ArticleName" template. [[User:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:purple">'''Que'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:red">'''Sera'''</span>]], [[User talk:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:orange">'''Sera'''</span>]] 19:25, August 15, 2010 (UTC)


:Indeed. The weapon's completely different from the standard plasma mortar, and while it should be mentioned on the plasma mortar page, it deserves its own article just like [[Covenant Artillery]] (which is a heavier plasma mortar and notably, has its own page), or like The Unbalanced Warrior noted, every MA5 or M6 variant. Even if we have no official name for the weapon, everyone can clearly see it's nowhere near the same as the Wraith's cannon and as such, should not be merged. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]]) </small>
:Indeed. The weapon's completely different from the standard plasma mortar, and while it should be mentioned on the plasma mortar page, it deserves its own article just like Covenant Artillery (which is a heavier plasma mortar and notably, has its own page), or like The Unbalanced Warrior noted, every MA5 or M6 variant. Even if we have no official name for the weapon, everyone can clearly see it's nowhere near the same as the Wraith's cannon and as such, should not be merged. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]]) </small>
19:30, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
19:30, August 15, 2010 (UTC)


:I made a mistake when I thought they referred to "plasma mortar" but Bungie said "mortar". But if this subject gets an article then I suggest that the Super Scarab get its own article because it is '''a lot''' different from the ''normal'' [[Type-47 Scarab|Scarab]] and there is a lot of evidence that it was created using the ''possible'' [[Forerunner]] artefact (British spelling of "artifact") because the [[Covenant]] would have already built it if they hed the resources. --{{User:Cally99117/Sig}}
:I made a mistake when I thought they referred to "plasma mortar" but Bungie said "mortar". But if this subject gets an article then I suggest that the Super Scarab get its own article because it is '''a lot''' different from the ''normal'' Scarab and there is a lot of evidence that it was created using the ''possible'' [[Forerunner]] artefact (British spelling of "artifact") because the [[Covenant]] would have already built it if they hed the resources. --{{User:Cally99117/Sig}}


::I'd say why not. A super scarab article seems fine by me, even though it isn't really that central to the story. Then again, the Scarabs in Halo Wars, Halo 2 and Halo 3 are considerably different in appearance and behavior, but don't have their own articles. One could argue that "Type-47 UHAP" only refers to the Halo 3 Scarab, while the others are different models whose formal designations are unknown. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 08:59, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
::I'd say why not. A super scarab article seems fine by me, even though it isn't really that central to the story. Then again, the Scarabs in Halo Wars, Halo 2 and Halo 3 are considerably different in appearance and behavior, but don't have their own articles. One could argue that "Type-47 UHAP" only refers to the Halo 3 Scarab, while the others are different models whose formal designations are unknown. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 08:59, August 16, 2010 (UTC)


:::I would oppose such thing. There is not much information known about vehicle, or the mechanics of the weapon fired by all those vessels. In fact, I don't think they all satisfy the [[Halopedia:Notability Policy|"significant coverage"]]). As such, it is easier to simply have them all in one article. True that ''"One could argue that "Type-47 UHAP" only refers to the Halo 3 Scarab"'', but the applied common word "Scarab" on all of these behemoths seems to suggest the designation does applies to all.- <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 09:19, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
:::I would oppose such thing. There is not much information known about vehicle, or the mechanics of the weapon fired by all those vessels. In fact, I don't think they all satisfy the [[Halopedia:Notability policy|"significant coverage"]]). As such, it is easier to simply have them all in one article. True that ''"One could argue that "Type-47 UHAP" only refers to the Halo 3 Scarab"'', but the applied common word "Scarab" on all of these behemoths seems to suggest the designation does applies to all.- <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 09:19, August 16, 2010 (UTC)


::::Nor is there much information on this subject so I support the separation. --{{User:Cally99117/Sig}}
::::Nor is there much information on this subject so I support the separation. --{{User:Cally99117/Sig}}


::::It's true that all of the models are commonly called "Scarabs", but then again, things like the [[BR55 Battle Rifle]] and the [[BR55HB SR Battle Rifle]] are commonly only referred to as "battle rifles" even when they are obviously different models with different designations. To avoid this, we could always call th T47 UHAP article "Scarab" and mention that only the Halo 3 one has a confirmed official designation while the others are just referred to as "Scarabs". The same would apply to [[Type-25 Assault Gun Carriage]] and [[Type-26 Anti-Infantry Stationary Gun]], which would be called "Wraith" and "Shade", respectively; it doesn't really make sense to apply the formal designation of the Halo 3 model to all of their iterations since the iterations in question are considerably different in appearance and function and we have no way to know for sure if the Halo 3 model's designation is applied to all of them. Obviously, the articles shouldn't be separated so that every different model would have its own article, but the name could be changed to describe the subject in general to avoid the assumption that all models have the same designation. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 09:48, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
::::It's true that all of the models are commonly called "Scarabs", but then again, things like the [[BR55 Battle Rifle]] and the [[BR55HB SR Battle Rifle]] are commonly only referred to as "battle rifles" even when they are obviously different models with different designations. To avoid this, we could always call th T47 UHAP article "Scarab" and mention that only the Halo 3 one has a confirmed official designation while the others are just referred to as "Scarabs". The same would apply to Type-25 Assault Gun Carriage and Type-26 Anti-Infantry Stationary Gun, which would be called "Wraith" and "Shade", respectively; it doesn't really make sense to apply the formal designation of the Halo 3 model to all of their iterations since the iterations in question are considerably different in appearance and function and we have no way to know for sure if the Halo 3 model's designation is applied to all of them. Obviously, the articles shouldn't be separated so that every different model would have its own article, but the name could be changed to describe the subject in general to avoid the assumption that all models have the same designation. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 09:48, August 16, 2010 (UTC)


:::::"Scarab" is a nickname for the plasma-spitting Covenant behemoth that wreck havoc over Arcadia (Halo Wars), New Mombasa (Halo 2/ODST) and Voi (Halo 3) while "Battle Rifle" is a term which defines the operation of the weapon. As such, the analogy you've given is incorrect... but anyways... I agree with the rest. :P - <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 09:57, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
:::::"Scarab" is a nickname for the plasma-spitting Covenant behemoth that wreck havoc over Arcadia (Halo Wars), New Mombasa (Halo 2/ODST) and Voi (Halo 3) while "Battle Rifle" is a term which defines the operation of the weapon. As such, the analogy you've given is incorrect... but anyways... I agree with the rest. :P - <font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Subtank|<font color="gold"><font color="#FF4F00">5</font>əb<font color="#FF4F00">'7</font>aŋk</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<font color="#FF4F00">7alk</font>]])</sup></font> 09:57, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Line 57: Line 57:
===Oppose (8/2)===
===Oppose (8/2)===
#{{Oppose}} - As per my statements and the Unbalanced Warrior's. [[User:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:purple">'''Que'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:red">'''Sera'''</span>]], [[User talk:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:orange">'''Sera'''</span>]] 19:38, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} - As per my statements and the Unbalanced Warrior's. [[User:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:purple">'''Que'''</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:red">'''Sera'''</span>]], [[User talk:FatalSnipe117|<span style="color:orange">'''Sera'''</span>]] 19:38, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} - The weapon is not a Wraith Plasma Mortar, it is entirely different. Bungie may have called it a "Plasma Mortar", but that is just a broad term used to describe the base type of weapon.--File:PENGUIN4.gif|15px]]''[[User:FluffyEmoPenguin|<span style="color:black; font-family:Verdana">Fluffy</span><span style="color:gray; font-family:Verdana">Emo</span><span style="color:black; font-family:Verdana">Penguin</span>]]<sup><small>([[User talk:FluffyEmoPenguin|<span style="color:gray">ice quack!</span>]])</small></sup>'' 20:22, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} - The weapon is not a Wraith Plasma Mortar, it is entirely different. Bungie may have called it a "Plasma Mortar", but that is just a broad term used to describe the base type of weapon.--''[[User:FluffyEmoPenguin|<span style="color:black; font-family:Verdana">Fluffy</span><span style="color:gray; font-family:Verdana">Emo</span><span style="color:black; font-family:Verdana">Penguin</span>]]<sup><small>([[User talk:FluffyEmoPenguin|<span style="color:gray">ice quack!</span>]])</small></sup>'' 20:22, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} - As per the above. The Unbalanced Warrior gave a nice analogy: it is merely one weapon in a ''class'' of weapons. If the Wraith's mortar were called the Type-7 Plasma Mortar, for instance, and Bungie gave the Revenant's weapon the same designation, the situation would be different. However, that is not the case. It is not the same thing. --[[User talk:Braidenvl|&quot;Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have.&quot; -Thomas Jefferson]] 01:16, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} - As per the above. The Unbalanced Warrior gave a nice analogy: it is merely one weapon in a ''class'' of weapons. If the Wraith's mortar were called the Type-7 Plasma Mortar, for instance, and Bungie gave the Revenant's weapon the same designation, the situation would be different. However, that is not the case. It is not the same thing. --[[User talk:Braidenvl|&quot;Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have.&quot; -Thomas Jefferson]] 01:16, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
#{{Oppose}} -They are different weapons and there fore should be seperate articles. If we merge these we might as well merge Plama Rifle and Plasma Repeater. {{Unsigned|Fatgunn}}
#{{Oppose}} -They are different weapons and there fore should be seperate articles. If we merge these we might as well merge Plama Rifle and Plasma Repeater. {{Unsigned|Fatgunn}}