Talk:UNSC Andraste: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Untitled==
Is this a different Corvette type? Shouldn't we make an article for it? --[[User talk:Sgt.T.N.Biscuits|Sgt.T.N.Biscuits]] 02:08, January 18, 2010 (UTC)
Is this a different Corvette type? Shouldn't we make an article for it? --[[User talk:Sgt.T.N.Biscuits|Sgt.T.N.Biscuits]] 02:08, January 18, 2010 (UTC)


Line 7: Line 8:
:Is it possible that this is the third ship attacking the Dreadnought in Halo 3.[[User talk:Halofan1234|Halofan1234]] 16:51, 28 January 2011 (EST)
:Is it possible that this is the third ship attacking the Dreadnought in Halo 3.[[User talk:Halofan1234|Halofan1234]] 16:51, 28 January 2011 (EST)


::I doubt it. It seems to have been an early design for the {{UNSCship|Forward Unto Dawn}}, based on the same number being on their HCLs. My theory is that they changed the design heavily once they came up with that warthog run (requiring a large cargo bay).-- [[User talk:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 17:00, 28 January 2011 (EST)
::I doubt it. It seems to have been an early design for the {{UNSCShip|Forward Unto Dawn}}, based on the same number being on their HCLs. My theory is that they changed the design heavily once they came up with that warthog run (requiring a large cargo bay).-- [[User talk:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 17:00, 28 January 2011 (EST)
That makes sense$$$$ (#@lof@n1234) 20:14, 30 January 2011 (EST)
That makes sense$$$$ (#@lof@n1234) 20:14, 30 January 2011 (EST)


Line 19: Line 20:


:::I think the ship is still considered as not canon because it was designed as a prototype to the UNSC ''Forward Unto Dawn''. Sure ''Paris''-class frigates have now been invented, but unless the ''Andraste'' is mentioned in ''Halo'' media, it's still not really part of the canon. (At least that's why I think Halopedia still considers it as not canon)[[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 16:13, 21 June 2013 (EDT)
:::I think the ship is still considered as not canon because it was designed as a prototype to the UNSC ''Forward Unto Dawn''. Sure ''Paris''-class frigates have now been invented, but unless the ''Andraste'' is mentioned in ''Halo'' media, it's still not really part of the canon. (At least that's why I think Halopedia still considers it as not canon)[[User:Imrane-117|Imrane-117]] ([[User talk:Imrane-117|talk]]) 16:13, 21 June 2013 (EDT)
::::Yeah, that's the gist of it. The ''Paris'' class in ''Reach'' was obviously based on this concept piece, but since the ''Andraste'' itself hasn't appeared in actual media beyond the conceptual stage, we can't really consider that particular ship as canon unless it gets mentioned in future media (doubtful). Besides, we wouldn't have much to say about the ship in a fictional sense - we can't use its hull number and we don't know anything about it beyond its name. For now, I think the production notes on this page and the mention in the trivia section of the [[Paris-class heavy frigate]] article will do. --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 16:25, 21 June 2013 (EDT)
Should one perhaps add the visible armaments from the concept art onto the page? That would probably encompass the 12 Harpoon nukes, atleast 4 unidentified (M870s though I reckon) gun turrets and atleast 12x5 (60) M58 Archer Missile Pods, though I doubt its more since the contemporary Charon decide didnt have top launchers like the actual Paris for all I know.
--[[User:Hakura 99|Hakura 99]] ([[User talk:Hakura 99|talk]]) 07:19, February 19, 2021 (EST)
==Andraste/Adriatic==
The name '''Adriatic''' is mentioned in the Artbook or elsewhere, or you put it as reference ?  [[Special:Contributions/88.120.49.44|88.120.49.44]] 13:13, 3 March 2015 (EST).
8

edits