Talk:AV-19 SkyHawk: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:AV-19 SkyHawk (edit)

Revision as of 18:22, June 20, 2019

11 bytes removed , 5 years ago

m

no edit summary

BaconShelf

Administrators

50,269

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[[Image:Skyhawk.jpg|thumb|These are NOT SkyHawks<BR><BR>Do not add this picture to the article]][[ Image:HW 1920x1200 6.jpg|thumb|These are Shortswords<BR><BR>Do not add this picture to the article]]You put 'vertical' instead of horizontal.
+File:Skyhawk.jpg|thumb|These are NOT SkyHawks<BR><BR>Do not add this picture to the article]] Image:HW 1920x1200 6.jpg|thumb|These are Shortswords<BR><BR>Do not add this picture to the articleYou put 'vertical' instead of horizontal.
 --[[User:EliteDeath|EliteDeath]] 20:02, 14 September 2006
+==Untitled==
 :Lol never mind I just read this article in Popular Science about vertical takeoff and landing, so I'm wrong and you're right. --[[User:EliteDeath|EliteDeath]]
@@ Line 14: / Line 15: @@
 If I recall correctly, Fall of Reach mentions them being jump jets. Harriers aren't the only planes capable of V/STOL take off/landing. Even today, we have the F35 JSF and the XF32 (which was better, but didn't get the liscense due to a grudge the Air Force had against the company).
-:--[[User:Rotaretilbo|Master Gunnery Sergeant]] [[w:c:halofanon:Hank J Wimbleton IV|<span style="color:#0000CC">Hank J Wimbleton IV</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Rotaretilbo|COM]]</sup> 05:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
+:--[[User:Rotaretilbo|Master Gunnery Sergeant]] [[halofanon:Hank J Wimbleton IV|<span style="color:#0000CC">Hank J Wimbleton IV</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Rotaretilbo|COM]]</sup> 05:36, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 ==[[Sparrowhawk]]==
 Anyone explored the possibility of these being the same aircraft? I'll email Nylund, though I doubt he knows, lacking a Halo Story Bible (Ensemble Studios would know more).
-:--[[User:Rotaretilbo|Master Gunnery Sergeant]] [[w:c:halofanon:Hank J Wimbleton IV|<span style="color:#0000CC">Hank J Wimbleton IV</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Rotaretilbo|COM]]</sup> 05:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
+:--[[User:Rotaretilbo|Master Gunnery Sergeant]] [[halofanon:Hank J Wimbleton IV|<span style="color:#0000CC">Hank J Wimbleton IV</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Rotaretilbo|COM]]</sup> 05:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 :No, I seriously doubt it, because the Skyhawk is supposedly capable of supersonic flight, which I seriously doubt the ducted-fans of the Sparrowhawk can pull off, being sort of an advanced assault helicopter decendant. The Skyhawk is also the name for a real vehicle (the A-4 Skyhawk jet) which further suggests this is a jet aircraft. [[User:Murder of Crows|Murder of Crows]]
@@ Line 35: / Line 36: @@
 Edit:  Sorry, I'm new here, and I can't figure out how to attach my pic I uploaded it, but I cant figure it out.
-:sorry, whoever you are, but it isn't. Since it was made by the fans, their version of the SkyHawk is classed as Non-Canon, and it can't be used. --'''[[UserWiki:Specops306|<font color=purple>Specops306]]</font>''', '''''[[User Talk:Specops306|<font color=blue>Kora]]</font> [[Special:Editcount/Specops306|<font color=purple>'Morhek</font>]]''''' 01:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
+:sorry, whoever you are, but it isn't. Since it was made by the fans, their version of the SkyHawk is classed as Non-Canon, and it can't be used. --'''UserWiki:Specops306|<font color=purple>Specops306]]</font>''', '''''[[User Talk:Specops306|<font color=blue>Kora]]</font> [[Special:Editcount/Specops306|<font color=purple>'Morhek</font>]]''''' 01:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
@@ Line 52: / Line 53: @@
 Some Halopedians have concluded that the ship that attacks John in the comic is not the proper depiction of a SkyHawk but instead of a [[AV-22 Sparrowhawk]]. However, I disagree with that because in the issue the fighter lacks the "Tail" of a Sparrowhawk and the tips of the wings are actually bent backwards and NOT forward as we would see on Sparrowhawk. [[User talk:Forgotten Helljumper|Forgotten Helljumper]] 16:55, 28 July 2012 (EDT)
 :You won't be able to see the tail of a Sparrowhawk from such angle as the tail is swept down and not up. And the shadowing of the tips of the wings are stylised in such way that they are bent forward. Unless you have another image that shows otherwise...— <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span>  17:18, 28 July 2012 (EDT)
-[[File:Skyhawk 2..jpg|150px|thumb|right|Truster instead of a tail?]]
+File:Skyhawk 2..jpg|150px|thumb|right|Truster instead of a tail?
-[[File:Skyhawk 1..jpg|150px|thumb|right|wing tips are bent backward.]]
+File:Skyhawk 1..jpg|150px|thumb|right|wing tips are bent backward.
 That wasn't a very good pic. I'll upload a different one. [[User talk:Forgotten Helljumper|Forgotten Helljumper]] 17:31, 28 July 2012 (EDT)
 :So, it's the tail being the problem then based on the two images. I'll double-check tomorrow and come back to this discussion to confirm. :) — <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span>  17:37, 28 July 2012 (EDT)
 Thank you for your time :} [[User talk:Forgotten Helljumper|Forgotten Helljumper]] 17:41, 28 July 2012 (EDT)
 ::Amended article. Looks like it lacks the twin tail that the Sparrowhawk has.— <span style="font-size:16px; font-family:OrbitronMedium;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span>  09:46, 29 July 2012 (EDT)
 ==50mm?==
 I'm pretty sure 50mm was a typo and the author meant to write 50 caliber. The [http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab60/Rama88_photo/50mm_zps02fe6d21.jpg showings] in TFoR are far closer to a .50 caliber machinegun than a 50mm autocannon( for reference, [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iy9VPTWyLh0 this] is a real life 20mm autocannon. [[User:Geomax|Geomax]] ([[User talk:Geomax|talk]]) 14:32, 9 October 2013 (EDT)