Talk:CAA Butterworth: Difference between revisions

From Halopedia, the Halo wiki

No edit summary
m (→‎Untitled: re-categorisation per CFD, replaced: {{UNSCship → {{UNSCShip (3))
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Untitled==
Is there a reason that this ship should not be categorized by its name? I had done so, but [[User:Stryker117|Stryker117]] removed it. Just curious. [[User talk:Auguststorm1945|Auguststorm1945]] 15:43, 22 January 2011 (EST)
Is there a reason that this ship should not be categorized by its name? I had done so, but [[User:Stryker117|Stryker117]] removed it. Just curious. [[User talk:Auguststorm1945|Auguststorm1945]] 15:43, 22 January 2011 (EST)


:The prefix shouldn't be used in categorisation - otherwise, both the {{UNSCship|Aegis Fate}} and {{UNSCship|Forward Unto Dawn}} would share a position within "U".-- [[User talk:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 16:05, 22 January 2011 (EST)
:The prefix shouldn't be used in categorisation - otherwise, both the {{UNSCShip|Aegis Fate}} and {{UNSCShip|Forward Unto Dawn}} would share a position within "U".-- [[User talk:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 16:05, 22 January 2011 (EST)


::Forerunner: I think you've misinterpreted and haven't checked the logs; what Auguststorm is doing is categorising them by omitting the prefix (i.e. included Butterworth instead of CAA Butterwortd). — <span style="font-size:200%; font-family:Freestyle Script;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<span style="color:#ED9121;">7alk</span>]])</sup></span> 16:11, 22 January 2011 (EST)
::Forerunner: I think you've misinterpreted and haven't checked the logs; what Auguststorm is doing is categorising them by omitting the prefix (i.e. included Butterworth instead of CAA Butterwortd). — <span style="font-size:200%; font-family:Freestyle Script;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Subtank|<span style="color:#ED9121;">7alk</span>]])</sup></span> 16:11, 22 January 2011 (EST)


:::That's what I did :/ You make sure that, for example, {{UNSCship|Pillar of Autumn}} is categorised as "<nowiki>[[Category:Ships|Pillar of Autumn]]</nowiki>" so it appears under "P" and not "U".-- [[User talk:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 16:26, 22 January 2011 (EST)
:::That's what I did :/ You make sure that, for example, {{UNSCShip|Pillar of Autumn}} is categorised as "<nowiki>[[Category:Ships|Pillar of Autumn]]</nowiki>" so it appears under "P" and not "U".-- [[User talk:Forerunner|Forerunner]] 16:26, 22 January 2011 (EST)
 
:::Misinterpretations... >.< — <span style="font-size:200%; font-family:Freestyle Script;">[[User:Subtank|<span style="color:#FF4F00;">subtank</span>]]</span> 17:03, 22 January 2011 (EST)

Latest revision as of 09:45, September 16, 2018

Untitled[edit]

Is there a reason that this ship should not be categorized by its name? I had done so, but Stryker117 removed it. Just curious. Auguststorm1945 15:43, 22 January 2011 (EST)

The prefix shouldn't be used in categorisation - otherwise, both the UNSC Aegis Fate and UNSC Forward Unto Dawn would share a position within "U".-- Forerunner 16:05, 22 January 2011 (EST)
Forerunner: I think you've misinterpreted and haven't checked the logs; what Auguststorm is doing is categorising them by omitting the prefix (i.e. included Butterworth instead of CAA Butterwortd). — subtank (7alk) 16:11, 22 January 2011 (EST)
That's what I did :/ You make sure that, for example, UNSC Pillar of Autumn is categorised as "[[Category:Ships|Pillar of Autumn]]" so it appears under "P" and not "U".-- Forerunner 16:26, 22 January 2011 (EST)
Misinterpretations... >.< — subtank 17:03, 22 January 2011 (EST)