Talk:Falcon Wing aerial descent unit: Difference between revisions
From Halopedia, the Halo wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ok, if they are less advanced...why are they safer?--[[User:JohnSpartan117]] [http://installation07.uk.to] 02:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | Ok, if they are less advanced...why are they safer?--[[User:JohnSpartan117]] [http://installation07.uk.to] 02:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Probably because users could control them. ODSTs have no control over HEVs, as discussed in | :Probably because users could control them. ODSTs have no control over HEVs, as discussed in HtF, so they would land anywhere, causing a lot of potenail injuries. -[[User:ED|ED]] 21:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Rewrote the article, however, i did make a conjecture on the type of parachute. Due to its description though, i think it is a pretty safe bet to assume its a ram-air type parachute. | Rewrote the article, however, i did make a conjecture on the type of parachute. Due to its description though, i think it is a pretty safe bet to assume its a ram-air type parachute. | ||
Delta Team Curt 02:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:28, May 24, 2018
Ok, if they are less advanced...why are they safer?--User:JohnSpartan117 [1] 02:22, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Probably because users could control them. ODSTs have no control over HEVs, as discussed in HtF, so they would land anywhere, causing a lot of potenail injuries. -ED 21:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Rewrote the article, however, i did make a conjecture on the type of parachute. Due to its description though, i think it is a pretty safe bet to assume its a ram-air type parachute. Delta Team Curt 02:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)