10,007
edits
Talk:Mendicant Bias: Difference between revisions
m
→The Terminal Icons: clean up, replaced: [[Image: → File: (4)
m (moved Talk:032 Mendicant Bias to Talk:05-032 Mendicant Bias: proper) |
m (→The Terminal Icons: clean up, replaced: [[Image: → File: (4)) |
||
| (17 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==I suspect...== | ==I suspect...== | ||
Mendicant Bias will have a hand in Halo 4 (don't deny there won't be a one, CLIFFHANGER ENDING!). His story in | Mendicant Bias will have a hand in Halo 4 (don't deny there won't be a one, CLIFFHANGER ENDING!). His story in the terminals reflects that of Durundal so i think his position may unfold later. This most likely isn't the last we've heard of him. --[[User:Ajax 013|Ajax 013]] 00:54, 23 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I don't think there will be a straight "Halo 4", but there certainly will be more Halo games. It makes sense that this mysterious character would be explored. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#000000">Dragon<font color="#FF0000">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#000000">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 01:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC) | :I don't think there will be a straight "Halo 4", but there certainly will be more Halo games. It makes sense that this mysterious character would be explored. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#000000">Dragon<font color="#FF0000">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#000000">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 01:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
Maybe Mendicant was the monitor of instalation 05, and Penitent Tangent is just a replacement since Mendicant went evil. | Maybe Mendicant was the monitor of instalation 05, and Penitent Tangent is just a replacement since Mendicant went evil. | ||
If that's true, delta halo has lost both of its monitors, one converted and one captured. interesting when you consider that the opposite happens on 04, which is blown up, replaced, then blown up again. | |||
:Remember that there were originally 13 installations. were they in the same order as they are now? also, u forgot to sign off. [[Special:Contributions/68.11.57.193|68.11.57.193]] 20:37, 18 June 2011 (EDT) | |||
::There were ''twelve'' originally. Mendicant's purpose wasn't to monitor a ring but to research on the Flood. He ''stole'' amother monitor's ringworld.-- '''[[User:Forerunner|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''''' 20:46, 18 June 2011 (EDT) | |||
:I don't know how to edit. because i dont do it often. so anything i type gets fixed. thank you for dealing with it. sorry i did my subtraction wrong. my heads not working well today. like, really not well. at all. on the page it states he was given control of a ring. where are u getting your information from? and wasn't mendicant the first monitor of a ring? [[Special:Contributions/68.11.57.193|68.11.57.193]] 21:01, 18 June 2011 (EDT) | |||
::I don't remember that in Cryptum. We know he was designed to study the flood and that, under the Master Builder's orders, stole the ring and took it around the galaxy. 43 years later he takes it it to the Capital, and influences the actions of their respective monitors in order to trigger an activation and destroy the Forerunner government in order to allow the Flood to spread unopposed. I read no confirmation that Mendicant Bias was a monitor and the ring was his, just that he agreed to brake the law and then stole the ring after performing the test.-- '''[[User:Forerunner|<font color="blue">Fore</font>]]''[[User talk:Forerunner|<font color="green">run</font>]]''[[Special:Contributions/Forerunner|<font color="red">ner</font>]]''''' 21:36, 18 June 2011 (EDT) | |||
:That explains my confusion. I didn't finish reading Cryptum. Stupid library fees. I sent an email to the bungie.net webmaster. i don't know who else to send it to cus im stupid. haha [[Special:Contributions/68.11.57.193|68.11.57.193]] 21:42, 18 June 2011 (EDT) | |||
== The unknown planet == | == The unknown planet == | ||
| Line 116: | Line 128: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
I think, then, that some changes should be made based on these meanings of the icons (Not Bias, Bias, and Not Rampant, respectively), but I'm not sure what those changes are. I guess a good starting point would be to rename [[:File:Mendicant Bias.svg]]; we need not rename [[:File:MendicantBias (Rampant).png]], as [[Talk:Main Page#Terminal Icons|it will (hopefully) be replaced with a suitable vectorized replacement]], which can be named appropriately. <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b> | I think, then, that some changes should be made based on these meanings of the icons (Not Bias, Bias, and Not Rampant, respectively), but I'm not sure what those changes are. I guess a good starting point would be to rename [[:File:Mendicant Bias.svg]]; we need not rename [[:File:MendicantBias (Rampant).png]], as [[Talk:Main Page#Terminal Icons|it will (hopefully) be replaced with a suitable vectorized replacement]], which can be named appropriately. <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b>File:DavidJCobb_Emblem.svg|16px]] [[User:DavidJCobb|<span style="color:#000;position:relative;top:.15em">DavidJCobb </span>]]</b></span> 20:33, September 1, 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I must amend my comment. I think that the first icon represents the Forerunners' central government, or some other official military organization. If that is the case, then it fits with the pattern -- the government may well be considered an "author". <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b> | :I must amend my comment. I think that the first icon represents the Forerunners' central government, or some other official military organization. If that is the case, then it fits with the pattern -- the government may well be considered an "author". <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b>File:DavidJCobb_Emblem.svg|16px]] [[User:DavidJCobb|<span style="color:#000;position:relative;top:.15em">DavidJCobb </span>]]</b></span> 00:20, September 3, 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I don't think that is the meaning of these icons. The first stands for Mendicant and Mendicant only, it is his original icon. The second one stands for Rampant Mendicant and Rampant Mendicant only, it s his icon for when he became rampant. These two icons are used to stand for Mendicant's Redeming (as seen on the Article page).-annonomus September 14, 2009 | ::I don't think that is the meaning of these icons. The first stands for Mendicant and Mendicant only, it is his original icon. The second one stands for Rampant Mendicant and Rampant Mendicant only, it s his icon for when he became rampant. These two icons are used to stand for Mendicant's Redeming (as seen on the Article page).-annonomus September 14, 2009 | ||
| Line 125: | Line 137: | ||
:::I must also point out that Mendicant Bias was ''not'' rampant during his communications with the Gravemind (where a blue version of Icon 2 was used). He had no delusions of god-like power and had no animosity toward the Forerunners. He was simply curious about what Gravy had to say. Only at the very end<sup>3</sup> of his talks with Gravy did Mendicant Bias become rampant; this is why his icon does not change in the Gravy conversations. And in Mendicant's final communication with the Forerunners, in which he reveals his rampancy, no icon is used at all. | :::I must also point out that Mendicant Bias was ''not'' rampant during his communications with the Gravemind (where a blue version of Icon 2 was used). He had no delusions of god-like power and had no animosity toward the Forerunners. He was simply curious about what Gravy had to say. Only at the very end<sup>3</sup> of his talks with Gravy did Mendicant Bias become rampant; this is why his icon does not change in the Gravy conversations. And in Mendicant's final communication with the Forerunners, in which he reveals his rampancy, no icon is used at all. | ||
:::Also, the article does not make any statements regarding the meanings of the icons; it only points out a similarity between one of Mendicant Bias's icons and the icon used by Offensive Bias. And if you think I'm wrong, check the Terminals yourself -- or save some time and check the [http://haloterms.bungie.org/ Interactive Terminal Archive] on HBO. | :::Also, the article does not make any statements regarding the meanings of the icons; it only points out a similarity between one of Mendicant Bias's icons and the icon used by Offensive Bias. And if you think I'm wrong, check the Terminals yourself -- or save some time and check the [http://haloterms.bungie.org/ Interactive Terminal Archive] on HBO. | ||
:::Oh, and you can leave a signature by typing <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>. If you do that, it leaves your IP address, a date, ''and a time''. <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b> | :::Oh, and you can leave a signature by typing <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code>. If you do that, it leaves your IP address, a date, ''and a time''. <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b>File:DavidJCobb_Emblem.svg|16px]] [[User:DavidJCobb|<span style="color:#000;position:relative;top:.15em">DavidJCobb </span>]]</b></span> 22:01, September 14, 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::<sup>1</sup> Terminal 1, Legendary: "The sacrifices they have chosen to make on behalf of their [brethren] fills me with pride." | :::<sup>1</sup> Terminal 1, Legendary: "The sacrifices they have chosen to make on behalf of their [brethren] fills me with pride." | ||
:::<sup>2</sup> Terminal 4: "//FLEET-WIDE MEMORANDUM 2/5" | :::<sup>2</sup> Terminal 4: "//FLEET-WIDE MEMORANDUM 2/5" | ||
| Line 132: | Line 144: | ||
::::I have already looked at the terminals many times and all I'm saying is that I am just telling you the theory that I am sticking to.There is no reason to get upset. But I did say the third one, being Mendicant's Redeming icon. And I never said your theory was bad. Your theory is all right, but I am sticking to the other theory, ''AND'' I never said you wrong, you could have said this in a nice way. - annonomus 8:12 September 14, 2009 (UTC) | ::::I have already looked at the terminals many times and all I'm saying is that I am just telling you the theory that I am sticking to.There is no reason to get upset. But I did say the third one, being Mendicant's Redeming icon. And I never said your theory was bad. Your theory is all right, but I am sticking to the other theory, ''AND'' I never said you wrong, you could have said this in a nice way. - annonomus 8:12 September 14, 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::Actually, I wasn't really upset. It's just that almost every time that I criticize a theory or edit on a wiki, I end up using at least a semi-hostile tone. I have no idea why, and I often never notice it until I've already posted the comment. 0_o <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b> | :::::Actually, I wasn't really upset. It's just that almost every time that I criticize a theory or edit on a wiki, I end up using at least a semi-hostile tone. I have no idea why, and I often never notice it until I've already posted the comment. 0_o <span style="background:#AADDAA;display:inline-block;height:16px;padding-right:4px;line-height:1em;position:relative;top:-3px;-moz-border-radius:0 50% 50%"><b>File:DavidJCobb_Emblem.svg|16px]] [[User:DavidJCobb|<span style="color:#000;position:relative;top:.15em">DavidJCobb </span>]]</b></span> 21:46, September 15, 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Mendicant Bias' Name == | == Mendicant Bias' Name == | ||
| Line 148: | Line 160: | ||
== Trivia section confusion! == | == Trivia section confusion! == | ||
Under the trivia section, one line reads "You can read the shard of Mendicant Bias' personality that made it to the [http:// | Under the trivia section, one line reads "You can read the shard of Mendicant Bias' personality that made it to the [http://halopedian.com/Ark Ark] by accessing all the terminals and getting the [http://halopedian.com/Marathon_Man Marathon Man] achievement." Where can you read the shard of his personality after you have accessed all the terminals? {{unsigned|72.201.27.61}} | ||
:It's not something that comes after reading the terminals. It's the action of reading the terminals. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">Dragon<font color="#F28500">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 10:03, May 26, 2010 (UTC) | :It's not something that comes after reading the terminals. It's the action of reading the terminals. --<b>[[User:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">Dragon<font color="#F28500">c</font>laws</font>]]<sup>([[User talk:Dragonclaws|<font color="#4D56B1">talk</font>]])</sup></b> 10:03, May 26, 2010 (UTC) | ||
: | : | ||
:I think it was mendicant bias who lead the humans to the first halo because it was to cowincidental that the happened to come across a halo ring in halo CE so mendicant must have taped in to the slipspace technolligy and led them to alpha halo when the humans entered random coordinates | :I think it was mendicant bias who lead the humans to the first halo because it was to cowincidental that the happened to come across a halo ring in halo CE so mendicant must have taped in to the slipspace technolligy and led them to alpha halo when the humans entered random coordinates | ||
actually cortana entered the data from the sigma octanus artifact from the fall of reach and thats what sent them to halo.[[User talk:The cheif|The cheif]] 01:22, August 14, 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Apperances == | |||
Mendicant was mentioned indirectly in Halo 2. In the level [[High Charity (level)|High Charity]], Cortana says, "I'll do what I can to slow the launch sequence, but there's ''something inside the ship...a presence that's fighting back''. For a Covenant construct, it's unusually formidable." | |||
The presence, as we all know, was Mendicant Bias. It should be listed in the "Appearances" section of the article. [[User:Iota Eta Pi|<span style="font-family:font; color:#B80000;">Ιι</span>]] [[User talk:Iota Eta Pi|<span style="font-family:font; color:#B80000;">Ηη</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Iota Eta Pi|<span style="font-family:font; color:#B80000;">Ππ</span>]] 19:08, 10 April 2012 (EDT) | |||
==Image== | |||
The Waypoint article on Bias and his cameo in the ''H2 Anniversary'' Terminals appear to have canonized the three-eyed design first seen in ''Origins''. Is it worth it, then, to make that be the page image for this article? For better or worse, it perhaps retcons the original one eyed description from ''Contact Harvest'', and the one-eyed look from Primordium could perhaps be explained as an old shell that was discarded for the three-eyed one after his exile on the Ark. | |||
I'm also curious about whether we should keep the "05-032" in the title of this article. In the fiction and in this wiki, he's rarely referred to by his full designation, as opposed to, say, 343 Guilty Spark. [[User:Tuckerscreator|<span style="color:#6600cc;">'''''Tuckerscreator'''''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Tuckerscreator|<font color="#008000">stalk</font>]])</sup> 04:14, 27 March 2015 (EDT) | |||
:While I personally prefer the abstract symbol as Bias' most representative image since a small metal bucket doesn't really do justice to a mind of the extent and complexity of a Contender ancilla, I can't deny that the three-eyed design has apparently become Mendicant's default or most recognizable "avatar". However, I generally hold that a mild contradiction (such as MB's teardrop casing) is not a retcon unless specifically stated to be one or unless the two versions cannot be reconciled in any way. In this case, the use of the three-eyed design in the H2A terminals may be a retcon, oversight or a conscious decision to use imagery familiar from ''Origins'' as a conceit of the visual medium, but it is not completely impossible to reconcile it with ''Contact Harvest''. Maybe the Covenant excavated the teardrop casing from that sarcophagus at some point between the taming of the Lekgolo and the dawn of the 9th Age of Reclamation? | |||
:As for getting rid of the "05-032", I'd be perfectly fine with that for the reasons presented (as well as consistency with the titling of [[Offensive Bias]]), though it should be noted that it's not forbidden nor in any way harmful to simply link the redirect [[Mendicant Bias]] wherever it's unnecessary to use the full designation (which is, admittedly, most of the time). --[[User:Jugus|<font color="MidnightBlue"><b>Jugus</b></font>]] <small>([[User talk:Jugus|<font color="Gray">Talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/Jugus|<font color="Gray">Contribs</font>]])</small> 07:27, 27 March 2015 (EDT) | |||